Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering_Democrat

Pornography has become more explicit over the years. In the ‘50s and ‘60s, for example, Playboy magazine didn’t show full frontal nudity. Now they do and have for years.

I don’t read any of those magazines, but I understand that some such as Hustler, now show urination and sexual situations with naked men and women. Things have gone from various stages of undress to full sexual situations.

And with the internet, I’m sure it’s no holds barred on what you can find.


7 posted on 07/30/2011 7:19:34 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego
And with the internet, I’m sure it’s no holds barred on what you can find.


Rule 34:



66 posted on 07/30/2011 9:32:13 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It is homo-eroticism mainstreamed—just conditioning....get used to the disgusting and it becomes normal.....Homosexual “porn” has always been sick debasement of the body, because it can’t be anything but that, since it is such a disgusting use of the human body. Such nihilism and idolatry.

....The homosexualization started with the sodomite Kinsey and continued with Deep Throat to make a common homosexual act “normal”. Hefner in the 50’s was used to objectify women and sexualize and titilate boys, and debase heterosexual commitments and marriage and create promiscuity as normal, which makes homosexuality not seem so “bad”. It was to kill the Christian paradigm that was prevalent in the 50’s. Designed by the cultural Marxists to destroy America from within. Bread and circuses....and chaos. Their favorite sodomites—the Beats were given prizes and elevated to the University canon to kick out the Classics which taught Values—virtue and honor, courage and loyalty and sacrifice.


70 posted on 07/30/2011 9:50:18 PM PDT by savagesusie (Virtue is a habit of the mind, consistent with nature and moderation and reason. Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Pornography has become more explicit over the years. In the ‘50s and ‘60s, for example, Playboy magazine didn’t show full frontal nudity. Now they do and have for years.

I agree, I could even say worse within the frame of the 70s and 80s as well.

The main issue I see with porn is someone giving themselves a fake, or a virtual stimulus, and having the problem of not remembering the virtual stimulus in the wrong way and context. But then again, this would be someone who has some need to do this frequently or for a great time period throughout the day. Again, the brain does wierd things regarding what is real and what is not.


127 posted on 08/03/2011 8:02:03 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson