Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McConnell Sees Deal “Very Close”; Focus Is on Triggers for Cuts
NYTimes ^ | July 30,2011 | MCHAEL D. SHEAR AND MATTHEW L. WALD

Posted on 07/31/2011 9:33:28 AM PDT by Steelfish

McConnell Sees Deal “Very Close”; Focus Is on Triggers for Cuts By MCHAEL D. SHEAR AND MATTHEW L. WALD

WASHINGTON — Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, said Sunday morning that he was “very close” to recommending to his members that they sign on to a debt deal with President Obama and the Democrats.

Speaking on the CNN program “State of the Union,” Mr. McConnell said the emerging deal included as much as $3 trillion in cuts over the next 10 years, with much of that decided later this year by a joint congressional committee.

“What conservatives want to do is cut spending,” he said. “We’ve come a long way. This agreement is likely to encompass up to $3 trillion is spending cuts.”

In addition, Mr. McConnell said the agreement would allow votes in Congress on a balanced budget amendment.

Mr. McConnell indicated that proposals to force action by the joint committee had been among the most contentious of the last week. He declined to be specific about so-called “triggers” of across-the-board cuts that would go into effect if the committee could not agree on a plan — a measure meant to put pressure on the committee to finish its work.

But he said the committee — made up of six Democrats and six Republicans — would be under tremendous pressure by the American people and the markets to implement the further spending cuts.

“That’s been an item of outstanding discussion for over a week,” Mr. McConnell said. “We’ll let you know what we’ve done on the trigger issues when we make the announcement.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: debtdeal; debtdealcavein; debtdealshowdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 07/31/2011 9:33:31 AM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It’s all still very unconstitutional ~ as Richard Nixon and Ronaldus Magnus both found out.


2 posted on 07/31/2011 9:35:40 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
agreement would allow votes in Congress on a balanced budget amendment

Yes, but does it REQUIRE these votes?

3 posted on 07/31/2011 9:37:43 AM PDT by SteamShovel (Smart Grid is Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“deal included as much as $3 trillion in cuts over the next 10 years”

I think we all know what is going to happen with the proposed cuts. Same as was promised to Ronald Reagan by the dimoKKKRATS. All BS.


4 posted on 07/31/2011 9:38:17 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

This from FoxNews:

“One source familiar with the talks noted that while the Medicare cuts would be capped, defense cuts would not and would make up roughly half of the total cuts. This mechanism could help compel Republicans avoid the “trigger” entirely by working through the commission to achieve deficit reduction.
But the framework of the deal floated perilously between the alternatives pushed by House conservatives and Senate Democrats. “

“The tentative plan would have Congress vote on a balanced-budget amendment — a key demand of Tea Party-aligned Republicans — but would not require Congress to approve it in order for the debt ceiling to be raised.
Top aides to House GOP lawmakers told Fox News they were concerned about the emerging deal. One source said it could be difficult to bring House conservatives back on board with such a plan. “

In Round #2, half-the cuts would come from defense so as to lure Republicans to vote yes.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/31/late-attempt-at-debt-limit-deal-to-avert-default/#ixzz1ThUvf9B9


5 posted on 07/31/2011 9:38:57 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"This agreement is likely to encompass up to $3 trillion is spending cuts.

The word "likely" is so typical of the Criminal Class in DC.

Translation: Likely = Never Happen

6 posted on 07/31/2011 9:39:04 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel

No.


7 posted on 07/31/2011 9:39:51 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Most of the elected in Washington don't care about unconstitutional-they just want their spending and influence pedaling to continue.Most of them would kill anyone who seriously got in their way.
8 posted on 07/31/2011 9:40:24 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Why does McConnell need a trigger for cuts? Why Does the Gobbler need a Blue-Ribbon Commission? Americans pay these hacks to vote.
Not “table” votes, install triggers or farm out the tough choices to a commission.
Most of these hacks need to be put out to pasture. The sooner the better.


9 posted on 07/31/2011 9:40:54 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

And just how much money that we don’t have is this new commission going to cost? I’ve got a better idea, mr clown congresscritter, why don’t you pay for it out of your overblown salaries, and leave me out of it, after all you are responsible for the mess that we are in. And one other idea, public executions for failure!


10 posted on 07/31/2011 9:42:05 AM PDT by mapmaker77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
It’s all still very unconstitutional ~ as Richard Nixon and Ronaldus Magnus both found out.

I don't know ... it sounds fairly similar to BRAC, which IS Constitutional.
11 posted on 07/31/2011 9:42:58 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Cuts my butt! Even if the Republicans get the Senate and Presidency and manages to keep the House, there will be no cuts worth a damn. Communists Democrats and dumb Republicans are the same.
12 posted on 07/31/2011 9:45:20 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
“One source familiar with the talks noted that while the Medicare cuts would be capped, defense cuts would not and would make up roughly half of the total cuts. This mechanism could help compel Republicans avoid the “trigger”.... In Round #2, half-the cuts would come from defense so as to lure Republicans to vote yes.

The Democrats are brazenly and unashamedly admitting that only Republican care about national defense and a strong military.
That is astonishing.

13 posted on 07/31/2011 9:46:20 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel
LOL, boob bait for bubba, nothing more. These clowns have gone to the mat to protect spending and their piggy bank and you think they are going to let a bunch of hay seeds take that away. Not going to happen.
14 posted on 07/31/2011 9:47:13 AM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Super-Committee, I can see it now: Durbin, Harkin, Boxer, Wasserman-Schultz, Schikowsky, and Clyburn on the (D) side - - - McCain, Brown, Collins, and 3 saps from the (R) house. Go-along-to-get-along compromising (R)s fold like a house of cards.


15 posted on 07/31/2011 9:47:13 AM PDT by jakota (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Abandon all hope, ye who come here.


16 posted on 07/31/2011 9:48:47 AM PDT by Founding Father (The Pedophile moHAMmudd (PBUH---Pigblood be upon him))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
BRAC is a planning tool. There's another process they use called United States Postal Service.

Neither are appropriations bills, nor are they revenue measures in the strictest sense.

17 posted on 07/31/2011 9:52:39 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Not good enough.


18 posted on 07/31/2011 9:53:01 AM PDT by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

Unless the “cuts” are in the current Fiscal year they don’t count. Congress votes financial matters anew every chance they get.


19 posted on 07/31/2011 9:54:39 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Like most Americans I am FED UP with these Republicants! I will work harder this upcoming election than I ever have to clear DC out! And I mean of Republicants who voted to not immediately cut debt!
IMHO, the economy of this country crashing maybe the only way we can start over and rebuild without these useless POS!!!


20 posted on 07/31/2011 9:55:44 AM PDT by 4everontheRight (And the story began with..."Once there was a great nation......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson