Posted on 07/31/2011 1:43:45 PM PDT by Veristhorne
On that subject, I’m open to alternative possibilities. It’s possible Oswald acted alone.....he was kind of a nut, let’s face it.
On the other hand, reasonable motives have been theorized for other people/organizations to have wanted JFK out of the way.
Would I be surprised or shocked if that were discovered? Not at all. Nor would I would be surprised to find out that a few other prominent assassinations in the 1960s were the handiwork of small cliques of conspirators. Generally, in order for a conspiracy to achieve maximum efficacy, it must be kept relatively small.....a good example is the al-Qaeda conspiracy regarding the September 11th attacks. Or even the rather disturbed fellow in Norway: a conspiracy of one, as far as has been determined thus far. The Reichstag Fire event is the subject of possible conspiracy, as it’s never been conclusively proven that the Nazi’s were behind it (though I’d say logic dictates that they were responsible for it).
So, if there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK, it was confined to a fairly small handful of people at the most, and done entirely with verbal orders. I don’t imagine someday someone’s going to find a note at CIA headquarters up in Langley saying, “.....and don’t forget to bring back some ribs on your way home from Dallas.”
No comment . . . except maybe to say . . .
it’s shocking the number of CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES
who have trouble seeing huge red barns on bright sunny days.
. . . Particularly with Marxist/globalist OThuga in the White House . . . not that long after his last meeting with said PTB.
EXCELLENT POINTS.
They convict themselves with their own words, my friend.
From the trilateral commission website:
Monetary anarchy must not be allowed to undermine the confidence in prosperity built up over two decades, nor to produce a new period of restrictions and mutual hostility from entrenched national positions.
Accordingly, it is the view of the rapporteurs that governments should proceed with dispatch to renovate the international monetary system.
The longer range reforms should include:
1.Improvement of the balance of payments adjustment process, with provision for smaller and prompter changes in exchange rates;
2.Confirmation of the central role as primary reserves of an international fiduciary issue, renamed bancor, to satisfy world liquidity needs and gradually to supplant other forms of reserve assets;
3.Creation of a new facility, to be lodged in the IMF, for emergency short-term lending to counter speculation and other disruptive capital movements;
4.Consolidation of foreign exchange reserves, initially on an optional basis, into a new account at the IMF;
5.Establishment of new and effective consultative machinery, within the IMF, to oversee the functioning of the renovated international monetary system and to encourage the coordination and consistency of domestic economic policies.
The rapporteurs also believe that governments should take a number of interim steps to help restore order and stability to the international monetary system. They should:
1.Commit themselves to coordinated intervention in exchange markets if necessary to prevent erratic movements in exchange rates;
2.Enlarge and multilateralize short-term lending facilities to offset large speculative movements of funds;
3.Consolidate, on a basis that can later be taken over by the International Monetary Fund, the excessive official holdings of dollars and other foreign exchange;
4.Indicate their willingness both to support the Eurodollar market and to subject it to close surveillance;
5.Sell gold, on a cooperative and coordinated basis, into private markets, with gains to be transferred to international financial institutions for development assistance.
http://www.trilateral.org/go.cfm?do=file.view&fid=1
There always seems to be an unnaturally large number of deniers pop up on Bilderger threads ... seems odd to me.
Just sayin ...
WELL PUT.
AIN’T THE MSM CONSTRUCTION ON ‘REALITY’ GRAND.
Warms the cockles of every Marxist/globalist’s heart.
I would say that anybody who is concerned about the Bilderberg conferences aren’t stupid or crazy, just unknowledgeable.
All that goes on there is the chance for prominent people to speak their minds on the various issues the world and verious countries face without worrying about the press taking a quote or assuming that whichever leader is speaking, that he is representing his government.
It’s probably one of the last places you need to worry about secret plans by a cabal of individuals, for the simple reason that there are too many people from too many backgrounds to keep any sinister secrets.
Take this test to see if you're a KOOK.
Do you believe powerful Americans are behind a world conspiracy to destroy the sovereignty of the United States of America?
Do you believe that the New World Order is a secret phrase used by conspirators to identify themselves to one another in a crowd?
Do you believe that the Federal Reserve exists as an institution for the conspirators to destroy the United States?
Do you believe that the eye in the pyramid in the dollar bill is a secret code of the New World Order?
Do you believe that David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, and other famous "one worlders" provide daily instructions to agents of the FBI, BATF, and the CIA?
Do you believe the CFR and the Tri-Lateral Commission serve as the front group to train and indoctrinate future one worlders?
Do you believe the Tri-Lateral Commission was created because too many bright people were onto the CFR?
Do you believe that CFR black helicopters, flown by U.N. pilots have been in the sky when American citizens have been shot on U.S. soil?
Do you believe that the feminist movement was the brainchild of David Rockefeller for the express purpose of having men and women at war with each other on a daily basis, so as to distract then from the real work of the CFR?
Do you consider Rick Perry to be a personal threat to your freedom?
If you answer even ONE of the above questions as "YES" then you are a KOOK!
The fact that someone attended a conference sponsored by some group or organization is a piece of information. If he was invited to the Heritage Foundation to speak about Federalism, would that make someone dumb to report it? I wouldn't think so.
So he went to Bilderberger to speak about Federalism. Is that supposed to be a big secret? If a person happens to read about it, are they supposed to ignore it, and not mention it because someone would ridicule them?
Why are the Rule for Radicals immediately applied to someone who merely mentions Bilderberger? Is the topic so threatening that the mere mentions deserves to be heaped with ridicule?
Bilderberger exists, Perry attended the conference - is there something wrong with that? If not, why the ridicule?
Denials of their existance is proof of stupidity.
The newspaper was The Dallas Morning News, a commie rag of the nth degree that prints every piece of democrapic propaganda and calls it truth. The kooks and froots run the Dallas City Council while the wha wha pretentious Dallasite democrats live in the rich bedroom communities and let the kooks and froots have their way. There’s also a rumor that Sarah Palin went to a Bildeberger meeting. Did she go? Did Perry actually go? This is something the commies use to scare the plebes, who are frightened of the big and powerful getting together about whatever they get together about.
If the Bildebergs summoned me, I’d certainly go see what they wanted. Hopefully not for the grand sacrifice or whatever they call it. lol For your information, Rick Perry is not a scull and bones secret society Harvard man.
He’s a Texas A & M Agri/Businessman. Born and bred into a husbandry of the land family. And yes, what you see is what you get. And yes, he’s a powerful politician who has helped lead a lot of sane and reasonable Texans keep our state in good shape. That’s why we keep electing him instead of insane commies like Kay Bailey Hutchison or Bill White.
NO, he’s not an elitist, nor is he into the global economy except for free trade. Texas is one of the biggest exporting states in the country. He was NEVER for the NA Union, however...Despite all the talk about the Trans Texas Corridor. He saw the Trans Texas Corridor as a state money making vehicle with little to no investment or maintenance upkeep. Unfortunately it involved eminent domain and the fact that Texans didn’t like foreigners having management control of a major highway up the middle of our state. So we slapped him up side the head. He listened and he backed off.
Don’t shoot yourself in the foot while listening to democrapic propaganda. Before they’re thru, they’ll even try to have him executing an innocent man. Oh wait, they’ve already tried that and bombed out.
“I know that I cannot be the only one that when the bilderburgers or trilats are mention....does anyone else start deducting I.Q. points from the crazy person or is that just me?”
I.Q. points aren’t figured that way, Grunthor, and they aren’t ours to deduct.
TIA
Googling “Perry attends Bildaburger meeting” brings up the Austin tv news report of his appearance and his topic for a presentation given was STATE RIGHTS AND FEDERALISM.
A book without end.
>>> “ Rush Limbaugh’s KOOK Test (Revised)
Take this test to see if you’re a KOOK. “ <<<<<<
LOVE THAT!! Good grief, the flat earth crowd hurts us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.