[Kenny Bunk]

Is this too simple ... or what?

(1) The White House DID NOT receive a "certified copy" of an original birth certificate from Hawaii.

(2)The White House received a newly created digital ABSTRACT of data on file in Hawaii.

(3)The White House then made various scanned "copies" of this ABSTRACT, including one which they tried on official looking document pattern paper..

(4) The White House then released "copies" to the media, allowing them and everyone else, to assume that this was a a "copy" of the birth certificate on file in Hawaii.

(5) It is not a "certified copy" of a birth certificate. It is a "copy" of an ABSTRACT. If anyone in the MSM needs to (or cares to) learn the difference between an ABSTRACT and a Certified Copy, ask a Real Estate Broker, or Title Officer, maybe even a Used Car Dealer.

The scam the Magic Marxist pulled ain't exactly rocket surgery. Besides, whatever happened to the "Natural Born Citizen" issue? Will Donofrio or somebody else renew his efforts to establish the Mombasa Moonbeam's ineligibility in 2012?

[Seizethecarp]

The 9th Circuit panel is still deliberating on Taitz and Kreep’s case in which Kreep did argue Donofrio’s NBC interpretation, IIRC. Taitz may have, too.

Orly may not be able to tell the difference between the front and back end of an SS# (dyslexia?) but she has noodled out how the forged pdf "BC" can't possibly have been in the HI vital records vault for the past 50 years. Lamberth may have a crush on her and been sucked into an S&M situation evidenced by his calling her possibly stupid or toying with him, but not denying her FOIA motion! Maybe she has aroused his curiosity as to what that FOIA will show?

[Kleon]

(2)The White House received a newly created digital ABSTRACT of data on file in Hawaii.

That includes the original signature by the registrar?