Condemning without evidence. Par for the course.
I didn’t think a statement with no real definition needed evidence prior to condemnation.
FIrst off, what constitutes a ‘pretext stop?’ Broken headlight? Speeding?
Second, what makes you think this was one of your so-called pretext stops? Aren’t these stops allowed under Terry V. Ohio?
Do you have any evidence for your statement, or are you just condemning without evidence? Oh, my bad. Par for the course.