Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steelers coach sells Mercedes to team cafeteria worker for $20
Yahoo Sports ^ | August 3, 2011

Posted on 08/04/2011 10:25:56 AM PDT by Wolfie

Steelers coach sells Mercedes to team cafeteria worker for $20

A cook at the Pittsburgh Steelers team complex is driving around in a red Mercedes convertible thanks to an unexpected and generous deal from the franchise's former secondary coach.

On his final day in Pittsburgh before taking over as defensive coordinator for the Arizona Cardinals, Ray Horton gave his 1999 Mercedes SL500 to cafeteria worker Maurice Matthews.

The cook had always kidded around with Horton, telling him he was coaching his position and asking when he'd be allowed to drive his sports car. Horton would jokingly reply, "you can't afford the gas in it."

But on his final day in Pittsburgh, Horton approached Matthews to say goodbye and asked if he could borrow whatever money he had in his pocket. When Matthews handed over a twenty, Horton said "sold for $20!" and handed him the keys to his car.

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: nfl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Wolfie

Edmunds says the true market value is $10,688.

It is a gift and there is not tax to either the giver or recipient since the value is under the gift limit.

http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz/sl-class/1999/?ps=used&sub=convertible&zip=27606


21 posted on 08/04/2011 11:38:13 AM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
The next day he drove Horton to the airport and received all the paperwork to take ownership of the car. With 64,000 miles on it, Matthews ended up paying $20 for a vehicle that carries a Kelly Blue Book value of $17,735.
22 posted on 08/04/2011 11:48:32 AM PDT by submarinerswife (Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig

Our state changed how they do things. They used to accept $1 sales for vehicles. Now they set a limit on how low a vehicle can sell for. Don’t recall but think at $100.


23 posted on 08/04/2011 11:50:09 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
To the IRS, it's a sale.

The DMV will get their tax.

24 posted on 08/04/2011 11:51:11 AM PDT by submarinerswife (Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2

Exactly! Just like all those people in Oprah’s audience who found out they had to pay the taxes on the new cars she gave them.


25 posted on 08/04/2011 11:52:04 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

26 posted on 08/04/2011 11:54:57 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2

Wait till the IRS knocks on his door

Not to mention the Commonwealth of PA and Allegheny County.
They ain’t walking away with 7% sales tax on twenty bucks.


27 posted on 08/04/2011 11:58:37 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Chapel Hill

“not” = “no”
sorry...


28 posted on 08/04/2011 12:39:28 PM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2

The IRS cannot do anything about it. He didn’t get the car for nothing, he paid 20 bucks for it. If he sells it for more than 20, then he has to declare the profit, other than that he is within the law, which is why the guy “sold” him the car instead of giving it to him, which would have cost him plenty in taxes.


29 posted on 08/04/2011 12:48:44 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sox_the_cat

Gift taxes are the responsibility of the giver.


You’re a little off. This has nothing to do with the giver’s eventual estate taxes.

The state may want to collect sales tax on the actual value.

The IRS (and state) may treat the transfer in excess of payment as imputed income, since they have effectively an employer-employee relationship. The recipient has a good argument that this has nothing to do with compensation for work, or an employment bonus.

Gift and estate taxes are relevant, until coach dies.


30 posted on 08/04/2011 1:09:20 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Government borrowing is Taxation without Representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

The story is a beautiful one. The comments about the taxes is a reflection on our tax system that is 1) confiscatory 2) arbitrary/ open to interpretation 3) unfair in any sense of the word. It is amazing that generosity would be taxed. But I believe this is no less different than the estate tax where the generosity to relatives is taxed. Render unto Ceaser...


31 posted on 08/05/2011 1:30:12 PM PDT by lfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson