Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China `unaware` of reported radioactive leak from nuke sub (response to SK gov inquiry)
Donga Ilbo ^ | 08/05/11

Posted on 08/04/2011 4:57:29 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

China `unaware` of reported radioactive leak from nuke sub

AUGUST 05, 2011 08:21

China is known to have told Korea that it does not know about a reported leak of radioactive materials to the Yellow Sea from a Chinese nuclear submarine moored in the Chinese port of Dalian in Liaoning Province.

The Korean Foreign Affairs and Trade Ministry told a regular news briefing Thursday that it has asked Beijing to confirm reports about the rumored leak. “We`re waiting for China’s answer,” said a ministry official.

Another ministry official said, however, that the ministry asked China through a diplomatic channel Tuesday to confirm the leak. The Chinese Foreign Ministry replied that it had no knowledge of the incident, adding that it was not under its jurisdiction.

The Korean Foreign Ministry is trying to confirm the incident though various channels other than the Chinese Foreign Ministry. Chinese authorities reportedly failed to provide a clear answer, however, simply saying such an incident cannot be confirmed easily.

“Radioactive leaks are a sensitive issue that can directly affect the Korean Peninsula, so we continue to ask China to inform us of the facts about the incident,” said a Korean government official.

Last month, China came under fire for its explanation on an oil spill in Bohai Bay. Beijing simply said the oil was unlikely to spread to the Yellow Sea but did not provide details on how much oil was leaked.

Despite a series of incidents that could negatively affect the Korean Peninsula, experts say China’s insincere responses to Korea`s inquiries hardly befit a country that is supposed to be a responsible member of the international community.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: accident; china; radiation; submarine

1 posted on 08/04/2011 4:57:34 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; Avenger; prion; Iris7; ...

P!


2 posted on 08/04/2011 4:58:34 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China ... the first hint should have been your sailors using each other for reading lamps.


3 posted on 08/04/2011 5:01:06 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Riiiiight. Just like the original fatality reports on that choo-choo mis-hap.


4 posted on 08/04/2011 5:06:38 PM PDT by Roccus (Obama & Holder LLP, Procurers of fine arms to the most discerning drug lords (202) 456-1414)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

So far I’ve seen no confirmation from either US, Japanese, or Taiwanese sources. Each monitor the Chinese coast and would detect a serious radiation incident.


5 posted on 08/04/2011 6:25:43 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

***China ... the first hint should have been your sailors using each other for reading lamps.***

“Your sailors using each other for reading lamps or no your sailors using each other for reading lamps”...

d
Dispute me that at this very moment [that based on the commotion/fuss that the world is making of the Shi Lang/Varyag], that not all eyes, meaning the US, Japan, S. Korea, Nam, India and Australian alliance are trained point blank at the so-called-radiation-leak at the Port of Dalian...

In other words: a smoke screen designed to pressure the ChiComs to open up the Port of Dalian to the public.


6 posted on 08/05/2011 10:02:19 AM PDT by EdisonOne (http://www.channel4.com/dia/images/Channel4/c4-news/MAY/04/04_helicopter_r_k.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson