[Uri’el-2012]

You are making assumptions about the resolution and the speed of a spring-wound camera that are simply not supportable, even if the camera was not handheld, which it was, and the film interrupted, which it may well have been. Again, the Zapruder film is as notable for the information which it failed to capture as the information which it did. And the information it did capture is open to multiple interpretations.

Don't let anyone intrude on your fantasies.

[wideawake]

Don't let anyone intrude on your fantasies.

It would be a fantasy to pretend that the Zapruder film was made with modern high-definition resolution and was digitally timed.

Of course, anyone who watches the footage will immediately notice that it has the blurry resolution and shaky frame speed (approximately 18 frames per sec, not a precise 24) one would expect from a camera that was built in the early 1960s and timed by a wind-up mechanism.

[oh8eleven]

Don't let anyone intrude on your fantasies.
WTF are you talking about?
You're the one who ascribes to a theory which FIFTY years of scrutiny have proven to be the real fantasy.
Gheeze, get a life.