Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Yorker's 'terrific' Michele Bachmann profile: 6 takeaways (Who were her influences?)
The Week ^ | 08/09/2011

Posted on 08/09/2011 5:31:41 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Profiles of Michele Bachmann have been plentiful since the congresswoman became a legitimate contender for the Republican presidential nomination. And now, in the latest issue of The New Yorker, Ryan Lizza delivers a "terrific" and "disturbing" look at Bachmann's worldview, intellectual influences, and life history. Granted unprecedented access to Bachmann and her campaign, Lizza explores the roots of Bachmann's beliefs. Here, six of The New Yorker's best revelations:

1. Bachmann's beliefs were shaped by an evangelical filmmaker

Bachmann calls the film series How Should We Then Live? by Francis Schaeffer — who was very influential in the 1970s and '80s — "life-altering," Lizza writes. The films trace the influence of Christianity on Western culture, beginning with ancient Rome and spanning through modern abortion battles. Essentially, Lizza writes, the movies "condemn the influence of the Italian Renaissance, the Enlightenment, Darwin, secular humanism, and postmodernism" because those movements removed God from the center of life.

2. And a controversial professor influenced her politics

While at Oral Roberts University, Bachmann worked as a research assistant for a fundamentalist law professor named John Eidsmoe as he wrote his 1987 book Christianity and the Constitution. Eidsmoe preached that "when Biblical law conflicted with American law," people should "work through legal and political means to get it changed." Over the years, Eidsmoe has fallen out of favor for appearing at a convention held by the white-pride Council of Conservative Citizens, and for supporting Alabama's Secession Day. Bachmann hasn't distanced herself from him, however, telling an Iowa audience last spring that Eidsmoe is still one of her greatest influences.

3. She's endorsed some strange Civil War theories

During her state Senate campaign several years ago, Bachmann recommended on her website a biography of Robert E. Lee written by Steven Wilkins, who claims that African slaves brought to America were "lucky," treated with respect, and fortunate to experience the "sanctifying effects of Christianity. This proves, says Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway, that Bachmann's historical "mistakes" on the issue of slavery — she was pilloried for saying the Founders worked hard to end slavery — "aren't evidence of ignorance," but instead "evidence of a worldview that is very different from what most Americans encounter in their daily lives."

4. She's revised her personal history while campaigning

Lizza also explains how Bachmann "touched up her image for a national campaign," says Noreen Malone at New York. His profile notes that while the official biography for her first congressional campaign in 2006 said that she "grew up in a broken home in Anoka, Minnesota," she now makes a point of telling supporters that she grew up in Iowa. (Bachmann was indeed born in Iowa, which hosts critical first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses). And while Bachmann says her experience as a former IRS tax litigation attorney makes her a tax-policy expert, former colleagues tell Lizza that she spent much of her time at the IRS on maternity leave.

5. Bachmann flies on a "Barbie jet"

The Tea Party darling dubbed her campaign plane the "Barbie jet," Lizza writes, describing a jovial atmosphere in which Bachmann seems genuinely in awe of the aircraft's extravagance. There is one steadfast rule, however: Journalists are not allowed to photograph Bachmann in her casual clothing. At one point, Bachmann faces the press while holding a newspaper with the headline "ROMNEY, BACHMANN LEAD REPUBLICAN PACK," which Lizza calls "the perfect shot." Once the press saw that Bachmann was wearing her cargo pants, however, "nobody took a picture."

6. Her husband is a "silver fox"

Bachmann's husband, Marcus, shows up in the profile in some "amusing conversations," says Malone. During one, he relays to Lizza that Newsweek had referred to him as a "silver fox," and was worried that it implied that he was homosexual. When Lizza explained that it was just a reference to his gray hair, Marcus Bachmann replied, "O.K., I can handle that." There's also a scene in which he attempts to psycho-analyze Lizza, and refers to himself as the most "high-maintenance" traveler on his wife's campaign jet.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: michelebachmann; newyorker; potus; profile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: SeekAndFind

Shoot, aim, score. She really is lucky.


21 posted on 08/09/2011 8:27:19 PM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

I didn’t mean to suggest there was anything ‘WRONG’ with being socially conservative, just that Bachmann is much more susceptible to having those things exploited to her detriment than Palin was.


22 posted on 08/09/2011 9:50:27 PM PDT by supremedoctrine (No need for a tagline, but here it is anyway..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

I didn’t mean to suggest there was anything ‘WRONG’ with being socially conservative, just that Bachmann is much more susceptible to having those things exploited to her detriment than Palin was.


23 posted on 08/09/2011 9:50:28 PM PDT by supremedoctrine (No need for a tagline, but here it is anyway..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: supremedoctrine

“I didn’t mean to suggest there was anything ‘WRONG’ with being socially conservative, just that Bachmann is much more susceptible to having those things exploited to her detriment than Palin was.”

I didn’t take it that way. Any Bible-believing Christian (except Catholics) will get this sort of attack, though. Secular Humanists find us scary and we are easy to caricature. Catholics get a pass for some reason—I think because so many swing voters are Catholic.

If the old media thinks it will help a dem, they will haul out the snake-handling in a second.


24 posted on 08/09/2011 11:30:25 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24
The New Yorker is showing its snooty side with this approach to Bachmann.

Yes, but that is offset by the very thorough job they did in analyzing all of Barrak Obama's background in 2008.

25 posted on 08/10/2011 5:07:00 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (I retain the right to be inconsistent, contradictory and even flat-out wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson