=
That has just about as much substance as that article.
Read the entire New Yorker Profile of Michele Bachmann here:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/08/15/110815fa_fact_lizza?currentPage=all
TITLE : Leap of Faith: The making of a Republican front-runner.
by Ryan Lizza
NOTE: Hugh Hewitt interviewed Ryan Lizza on his show today regarding this article.
“...condemn the influence of the Italian Renaissance...”
HOW WE SHOULD THEN LIVE does not condemn all the art of the Renaissance. The New Yorker is showing its snooty side with this approach to Bachmann.
So who exactly was quoted as characterizing it as “terrific”? The synposis made it sound like a highly
critical hit job.
It’s a fact that Bachmann has a lot in her history that’s quite a bit more staunchly and leaning toward RIGIDLY social
Conservative than all the other announced candidates-—the MSM, as you can see, is working overtime to exploit all these things in the most damning way possible. She’s getting the Palin treatment, and will continue getting it, but the facts are that Palin , whether she runs or not, is a lot, well, “hipper” than Bachmann, and has a lot less to exploit, since she’s already been drained by the MSM of what was exploitable.I don’t think there’s too much more they can do to Palin that wouldn’t make them look like the bullies they are, and they’ve already found out that the more they attack her the stronger she gets. America has LOVED seeing that process in action. Sara should run, but her position becomes increasingly awkward, vis-a-vis Bachmann.
I was shown the Francis Schaeffer how then should we live series every year for years in lutheran grade school and high school.
The only thing radical about the man was his selection of outfits based around corduroy knickers.