Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: High-speed rail price tag soars again, this time on pace to surpass $60 billion
Mercury News ^ | 8/10/11 | Mike Rosenberg

Posted on 08/10/2011 9:12:03 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

For the second time since voters approved California's massive bullet train project, the state on Tuesday raised the total price tag for the first stretch by several billion dollars -- and now the cost for the entire rail line is on pace to skyrocket to an eye-popping $60 billion to $80 billion or even more.

The latest estimates put the cash-strapped state even further behind in bankrolling its biggest, and one of its most polarizing, public works plans ever, as California struggles to secure funds from shy investors and broke governments. Still, project officials are ramping up to spend billions of dollars to break ground on the rail line in the Central Valley next year and hope to find the rest of the money to pay for the system later. It's a plan state leaders look increasingly likely to veto.

"It could be well into $60 billion, and who knows where it ends. This is really very serious and needs to stop in its tracks," said state Sen. Alan Lowenthal, D-Long Beach, chairman of the Senate committee overseeing the project. "We can't just be acting as if someone's out there giving us wheelbarrows full of money, and it's just coming. This is not the way we should be operating."

The California High-Speed Rail Authority's new cost estimates released Tuesday show the initial stretch of construction between Merced and Bakersfield will cost $10 billion to $13.9 billion depending on how it's built. Project planners had previously pegged the section at $6.8 billion.

If the cost of the entire project balloons at the same pace as the Central Valley section, the San Francisco-to-Anaheim railroad would cost from $63 billion to $87 billion, .. And those figures do not include inflation, which could push the final cost toward a staggering $100 billion.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; highspeedrail; price; soars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Brookhaven

He’s a VERY liberal Democrat, too. They’re starting to get the message that we don’t even have a penny left to spend on this crap, let alone $60-80 billion.

The money’s just plain gone.

21 posted on 08/10/2011 10:03:35 AM PDT by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I think buses would be a better idea. How many buses could you buy for 60 billion? Put televisions on the buses, give them wi-fi, maybe a refreshment vending machine, and they would become really attractive.

22 posted on 08/10/2011 10:03:45 AM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

It’s not going to be built. No way. Unless the initial construction is paid 100% by federal funds.

23 posted on 08/10/2011 10:22:22 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot . . .


They already have the turnpike. They’d have to shut that down to get enough riders to exceed 10 riders. Let me guess, the idea came from Democratic lawmakers from the Tulsa area who will then get a “ride for free” pass, since they are lawmakers.

24 posted on 08/10/2011 10:25:25 AM PDT by cizinec ("Brother, your best friend ain't your Momma, it's the Field Artillery.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: frposty

At this point, it would almost make more sense to build separate HOV lanes on the interstate reserved for self-guiding automated buses that run at 120+ mph. Probably cheaper and much much more innovative.

25 posted on 08/10/2011 11:00:39 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

No mention of the millions already spent on environazi orgs to do their “studies” of the effect on sand flies and desert rats.

The state is being run by complete morons.

26 posted on 08/10/2011 11:09:07 AM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

“build separate HOV lanes”

No, use existing lanes. Increased bus ridership will decrease the number of vehicles on the roads.

Another thought: allow “jitneys” which I think are independently run buses, vans, etc. Right now the regulated public transportation organizations keep out these independents. That establishment would tell us that the independent transporters would be too dangerous.

27 posted on 08/10/2011 11:11:48 AM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

This news accompanies the article that details how California took in too little tax revenue recently.

Sounds like time for massive tax hikes on businesses and citizens because, obviously they’re not paying their fair share.

28 posted on 08/10/2011 11:27:24 AM PDT by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

There used to be, until I think about 1970, a guy who used to dynamite a portion of the california aquaduct in one of the valleys impoverished of water. The theory was he was a displaced farmer who lost his land due to no water in the 30’s after it was syphoned off. I cannot wait for the new vigilante to show up after this albatross is built. I hope they put scoring rings on it too as it would make a great moving target.

29 posted on 08/10/2011 11:29:54 AM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is such CRAP. It was sold to the voters as self-supporting, not as a taxpayer supported entity. It was sold as a rail line between LA and Sacramento, not a rail line someplace out in the farmlands. It was to be an initial investment of $10 billion and the rest would be picked up by investors. Now it is waaaaaay more and rising.

Foul. Crap. BS. What more can we say. Kill this monster and put us out of our misery.

30 posted on 08/10/2011 11:42:18 AM PDT by BAW (I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I don’t think the whole thing will be, but you watch as at least one section is built. The San Fran link would seem to be a sure bet. What Democrat in California could resist that?

It does seem that even some Democrats in the state think this is too big a pill to swallow though. Good for them, at least with regard to this matter.

31 posted on 08/10/2011 2:09:51 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The Destroyer is anti-US anti-West anti-Christian anti-Israel and reminiscent of the anti-Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The San Fran link would seem to be a sure bet.

What percentage of that will be paid with federal funds?

32 posted on 08/10/2011 2:25:01 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This puppy will cost closer to 100 Billion and would likely exceed that figure.

More like a billion dollars a mile.

33 posted on 08/10/2011 3:05:43 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

CA has what, about 30,000,000 people?
So this amounts to 2,000 dollars for every single person in CA?

Where the heck they gonna get that kind of money?

Seriously, isn’t it time yet for these politicians to get their heads out of their asses?

34 posted on 08/10/2011 3:09:29 PM PDT by djf (One of the few FReepers who NEVER clicked the "dead weasel" thread!! But may not last much longer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

Glad we turned down the Fed’ s billions for our 80 mile rail system to Disney World. The dems are still complaining about the money we LOST when our governor said no to the FREE money. I think some of the money went to IL and CA...thank you Gov.Scott of FL.

35 posted on 08/10/2011 5:55:24 PM PDT by tankrlm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cizinec

I’m sorry to say that there are many Chamber of Commerce types and others who would call themselves Republicans who think they can plan an economy and spend other people’s money for the “public good”. I don’t know how we ever let politicians get away with this economic development nonsense that employs a bunch of bureaucratic planners to pick winners and losers in business. It’s a gussied up version of the Soviet 5-year plans, and it always fails! Let the free market work!

As for the high speed rail, it seems everybody wants one these days. I have also heard of a proposal for one between OKC and Dallas. The promoters claim that it will bring benefits to all the little towns in between. Huh? If the dang thing stops at every little town, then in what way is it high speed?

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot indeed.

36 posted on 08/10/2011 10:05:21 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tankrlm

Free money is never free money if its got strings attached,if you have to spend 10$ for every one given....then you are still going to end up quite broke.

37 posted on 08/11/2011 9:13:30 PM PDT by Del Rapier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson