Skip to comments.
An Explosive New 9/11 Charge
Daily Beast ^
| August 11, 2011
| Phillip Shenon
Posted on 08/12/2011 5:09:05 AM PDT by lbryce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Michael Moore's done another mockumentary?
1
posted on
08/12/2011 5:09:07 AM PDT
by
lbryce
To: lbryce
Richard Clarke....his picture should be under the fake words loser-burger.
So okay, we can write books based on speculation now?
First, I hope it’s considered fiction. Second, even if true....so the CIA tried to recruit people who could speak both Arabic and English? It’s not unheard of. This is the Clarke nothing-body trying to be somebody again.
2
posted on
08/12/2011 5:13:12 AM PDT
by
Fishtalk
(http://patfish.blogspot.com/201102/freerepublic-ping-list-compilation.html-Freep Ping Blog post)
To: lbryce
BS!
3
posted on
08/12/2011 5:13:50 AM PDT
by
nhwingut
(Palin '12... Accept No Other)
To: lbryce
Richard A. Clarke. Stopped reading right there. Anything he has to say is probably a lie.
4
posted on
08/12/2011 5:15:32 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(a Sarah Palin supporter and proud of it.)
To: lbryce
I speculate that Clark abuses his wife and tortures small dogs.
5
posted on
08/12/2011 5:19:45 AM PDT
by
listenhillary
(Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
To: lbryce
6
posted on
08/12/2011 5:22:26 AM PDT
by
PieterCasparzen
(We need to fix things ourselves)
To: lbryce
What a misleading opening sentence!
7
posted on
08/12/2011 5:23:17 AM PDT
by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: lbryce
...CIA Director George Tenet and two former top aides are fighting back hard against allegations that they engaged in a massive cover-up in 2000 and 2001 to hide intelligence from the White House and the FBI that might have prevented the attacks.Whoa, there.
Does anyone recall the Gorelick memo?
It was Jamie Gorelick, who wrote the policy which stovepiped information from intelligence agencies and LEOs and prevented cross-checking and information sharing between agencies. (Probably to keep a bunch of the Clinton's deals under wraps).
Later she sat on the 9/11 commission (!), likely to find ways to quash or discredit any information which would have held the Clintons and others culpable in the attacks.
I see this as just another poke at the Bush WH, when the policies were put in place by the former occupants.
8
posted on
08/12/2011 5:26:06 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: lbryce
Clark is a egotistical weasel ... he’s managed to milk 9/11 for nearly the last ten years. He appears on ABC frequently in some sort of security consultant role. Early on he bashed the Bush administration concerning 9/11 ... mostly because Condoliza Rice was in the process of lessening his advisory role to the WH ... a position he held during the Clinton era.
9
posted on
08/12/2011 5:26:24 AM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: McGruff
To: lbryce
So the Clinton administration tried to recruit these guys?
11
posted on
08/12/2011 5:27:47 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: lbryce
CIA ... allegations that they engaged in a massive cover-up in 2000 and 2001 to hide intelligence from the White House and the FBI ... .OK, Clarke is a loon, but it may be interesting to see how his fellow loons on the left handle this paradigm shift. What are they going to chant if it can be shown that Bush *didn't* know and it *wasn't* Bush's fault?!
All sarcasm aside, Clarke is a loon.
To: lbryce
A Summary of Richard Clarke:
“Clarke speculatesand readily admits he cannot prove...”
13
posted on
08/12/2011 5:28:56 AM PDT
by
John W
(Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
To: lbryce
Time for someone to cue up the “Aw, not this shit again” photo.
And 3-2-1.....
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: lbryce
"...suggests the CIA tried to recruit 9/11 hijackers... Clarke offers an incendiary theory that, if true..." Ha, I can suggest anything, I can offer up theories all day long. Doesn't mean I'm not full of ... (just ask my wife!). This guy is selling something, puffing himself up. He's got an agenda. Throwing out unfounded, unsupported allegations is cheap. All he and his cohorts are doing is making the CIA defend themselves from ridiculous, but hard to completely disprove claims. Hard to prove a negative unless you open up the books on all the CIAs activities at the time and say "see, nothing in there about these jerk offs!" Even then, many will claim the CIA destroyed the records...
Hey, Clarke, you stop cheating on your wife yet? Sure, you claim you never have but... How's it feel with the shoe on the other foot so-to-speak?
16
posted on
08/12/2011 5:44:50 AM PDT
by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Smokin' Joe
Yes, Gorelick removed with approval of those at probably the highest level the ability of the agencies to talk to one another. It was a Wall not allowed to be penetrated. (imho) the agencies tried as best as was possible with the WALL in place to circumvent. The agencies failed, because of the Wall. The commission reminded me of the Warren commission, complete cover-up. Sorry Joe, did not mean for this to turn into a rant. My apology. Happy to see you remember.
17
posted on
08/12/2011 5:47:07 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
To: lbryce
I am not sure I believe this claim, but it would not surprise me if the CIA withheld information from President Bush, especially in the hunt for OBL.
18
posted on
08/12/2011 5:49:45 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(0bama got 0sama?? Really, was 0sama on the golf course?)
To: lbryce
Former national-security aide Richard Clarke...
Wasn’t he found in a closet with Bill Clinton’s panties on his head?
19
posted on
08/12/2011 5:51:57 AM PDT
by
frankenMonkey
(By God, we will not squander what has been given us!)
To: lbryce
...2000 and 2001 that two Saudi-born terrorists were on U.S. soil>>>Duh! They were taking flying lessons!...
not landing lessons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
20
posted on
08/12/2011 5:53:50 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson