Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LostInBayport; xzins; wmfights

From the opinion:

“The individual mandate, however, can be severed from the remainder of the Act’s myriad reforms. The presumption of severability is rooted in notions of judicial restraint and respect for the separation of powers in our constitutional system. The Act’s other provisions remain legally operative after the mandate’s excision, and the high burden needed under Supreme Court precedent to rebut the presumption of severability has not been met.”


73 posted on 08/12/2011 11:59:34 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe; LostInBayport; xzins
From the opinion:

“The individual mandate, however, can be severed from the remainder of the Act’s myriad reforms. The presumption of severability is rooted in notions of judicial restraint and respect for the separation of powers in our constitutional system. The Act’s other provisions remain legally operative after the mandate’s excision, and the high burden needed under Supreme Court precedent to rebut the presumption of severability has not been met.”

I hate seeing this. At best we won a pyrrhic victory. If the rest of the law is enacted insurance co.'s will go broke and we will end up with the govt running healthcare.

155 posted on 08/12/2011 4:16:08 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson