But Obama be President now. A brother can do what he want.
“Yall can track a tweet down but cant solve murders!”
Really? Well y’all gots time to bust a tweet fo The Game but caint tell tha Po-Po who capped my nizzle!
Why is it the first time I ever hear of these rappers is when they are arrested? Although this Game idiot I might have heard of before from another attention whoring episode of his.
And BTW; Aren’t there antitrust/competition laws in this country? Why does every top 40 station I hear play the same 5 songs over and over and over and over? Does the public really need to hear that moronic “tonight tonight” song over and over, even at baseball games?
Everybody knows these songs are pure shiet, yet they keep playing them over and over and over. They are pushing and selling these songs by using repetition, not based on whether they are good or not. I thought Congress was looking into this a few years back? Or did the
‘Ratslook the other way once again for a price? Yeah, nice going. Now all we get on the radio is gay music even though gays only make up 2% of the population. Lady Ga Ga is #1. Yeah OK, and Obama is the greatest President in the history of mankind. Get the F outta here.
He actually wrote “dat”? I always thought it was just pronounced wrong.
It seems that The Game isn't intelligent enough to attempt the Weiner defense...not that it worked for Weiner either, of course.
Wonder if anyone died due to his tying up the PD’s emergency number . . . you know, The Game actually causing what he was complaining about?
He jes be talkin’ trash to da trash. You gots issues wit dat?
Gotta stop channeling - my gag reflex told me to.
They had better find an on-point law. No bending and twisting statutes to find something to throw at him because they're miffed their donuts and coffee were interrupted.
It was a non-emergency number. I find the distinction important. It's not like his tweet overloaded 911 which really would be more like the claimed "'Fire' yelled in a crowded theater" example.
It hasn't been shown he had the necessary mens rea, or criminal intent, here or even what his intent was.
We need to be careful when cases like this come up that we don't kneejerk against a "perp" because of his job, language skill or other irrelevance.
Today it could be prosecuting here on thin legal ground and tomorrow it could be prosecuting those advocating calls on issues.
Civil libertarians should watch how this plays out. If he had intent and clearly violated a statute, throw the book at him but watch out for overzealous prosecution by an embarrassed system.