[SoConPubbie]

More 10+ year old spam. From the LATimes , no less. Did his position on this change?

I could find no evidence of that, if I had, I would not have posted this article.

If his position has not changed, if he did not admit this was a terrible mistake, then it is fair game and should give us insight into how this conservative poseur thinks. It should also give you pause if you are or thinking about supporting Perry.

Who cares if it is from the LA Times, it is not denigrating Rick Perry, just reporting the facts.

Quit being an apologist for Rick Perry and stick to being a conservative.

[precisionshootist]

I’m not sure how you bringing up these “facts” is going to help get a conservative elected and get rid of Obama.

Face it. Perry has a significant chance of being the nominee. Assuming for a moment he is the nominee, what are YOU going to do?

Support him?, Vote for Him?

Or Not vote, Or vote for Obama?

If you say you would support Perry as the nominee, then I hope you realize you are shooting yourself in the foot with this stuff.

[BobL]

“Who cares if it is from the LA Times, it is not denigrating Rick Perry, just reporting the facts.”

Actually, if it was the LA Times, they’re praising Perry. But you’re right on the mark, except that you mention the year up front.