Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bulwyf
Yeah, and I've taken a lot of abuse over the past decade, defending the U.S.A. in regards to the W.O.T., and its various theaters of operation.

Yes, Pakistan is an untrustworthy “ally”. Yes, Bin Laden needed to be taken down. No disputes there.

However, sovereignty still means something. If, lets say, a N. Korean rocket were to land on U.S. soil & fail to explode — would the U.S. feel compelled to simply return it to N. Korea? Or, at least, to just bury it, without letting anyone else look at it? Would you simply overlook the incident — ignoring the intrusion into your sovereign space?

28 posted on 08/14/2011 1:15:53 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Sovereignty only applies to the Pakis when they want it to.

When Taliban and Al Quaeda are harbored in their hinterlands they disclaim sovereignty and take no responsibility.

When Bin Laden is under their noses, they disclaim sovereignty and take no responsibility.

Can’t have it both ways. Either we hold them responsible for harboring terrorists, or we clean up their mess.


37 posted on 08/15/2011 6:51:30 AM PDT by dervish (out of Afghanistan NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson