Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia space chief regrets focus on manned missions
AFP ^ | August 11, 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 08/14/2011 8:11:25 PM PDT by decimon

The new chief of Russia's space agency on Thursday said it had put too much emphasis on manned space flight and needed to increase financing on projects that brought a tangible return.

Roskosmos chief Vladimir Popovkin, in one of his first interviews since taking office this year, said the agency was spending almost half its budget on manned flight and it was no longer good enough just to put a human in orbit.

"In Roskosmos, unfortunately, at a certain time there was a very big shift to manned spaceflight. The budget for manned flight programmes takes up almost half of the budget of the entire agency," he told the Kommersant daily.

"If manned spaceflight shows results, it's useful. But if a person just wants to be in orbit, then I do not consider this to be a beneficial activity. There needs to be a return," Popovkin declared bluntly.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/14/2011 8:11:28 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon

But what are they doing to promote Islam?


2 posted on 08/14/2011 8:14:52 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Backward way of saying they are behind the eight ball on drone technology.


3 posted on 08/14/2011 8:15:26 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

I like your tagline... When I see how there government works in that movie that’s exactly how I picture all levels of ours working


4 posted on 08/14/2011 8:18:13 PM PDT by dareon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

And you know who is now paying for most of that 1/2 budget for Manned Spaceflight? The USA.

With the last shuttle mission done, USA is now paying $55M a seat on each 3 seat launch (and one is always a Russian Pilot).


5 posted on 08/14/2011 8:18:31 PM PDT by Oiao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

And you know who is now paying for most of that 1/2 budget for Manned Spaceflight? The USA.

With the last shuttle mission done, USA is now paying $55M a seat on each 3 seat launch (and one is always a Russian Pilot).


6 posted on 08/14/2011 8:18:50 PM PDT by Oiao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

And you know who is now paying for most of that 1/2 budget for Manned Spaceflight? The USA.

With the last shuttle mission done, USA is now paying $55M a seat on each 3 seat launch (and one is always a Russian Pilot).


7 posted on 08/14/2011 8:19:02 PM PDT by Oiao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oiao

Oops - Mods, ‘Clean up on isle 3’.


8 posted on 08/14/2011 8:19:55 PM PDT by Oiao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I'm surprised, since they did have those lunar rovers and return craft towards the end of the Apollo era.

OTOH, their Mars missions leave something to be desired in terms of even partial successes.

I daresay that they are probably jealous of the experience that JPL has in traveling by gravity boost.

9 posted on 08/14/2011 8:26:48 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oiao

Yes!!!!


10 posted on 08/14/2011 8:29:41 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oiao
(and one is always a Russian Pilot).

Well, there is that pesky parachute release timing maneuver at the end of the flight...

11 posted on 08/14/2011 8:30:06 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: decimon

The new chief of Russia’s space agency on Thursday said it had put too much on manned space.
GOOD FOR HIM americcan taxpayershould havetopped Pres Kennedy from wasting all that money sendinh man to moon
now westuck with paying for it


12 posted on 08/14/2011 8:43:05 PM PDT by tommix2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I wonder where the “International” Space Station will impact?


13 posted on 08/14/2011 8:49:04 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Probably because so many of them got killed.


14 posted on 08/14/2011 8:56:37 PM PDT by Carl LaFong (Experts say experts should be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tommix2
GOOD FOR HIM americcan taxpayershould havetopped Pres Kennedy from wasting all that money sendinh man to moon now westuck with paying for it

I don't know if you're serious but I'm much in agreement with this. I believe we should have put more into the X-20 project and less into Apollo.

15 posted on 08/14/2011 9:00:04 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: decimon
I believe we should have put more into the X-20 project and less into Apollo.

That was the original plan, but the Russians putting Gagarin in orbit was what prompted JFK to make his Moon speech and give NASA a blank check to get there.

16 posted on 08/14/2011 9:11:40 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I believe we should have put more into the X-20 project and less into Apollo.

That was the original plan, but the Russians putting Gagarin in orbit was what prompted JFK to make his Moon speech and give NASA a blank check to get there.

I can appreciate that but I think we knew they weren't really ahead of us. There is also an argument that X-20 hadn't clear objectives. nonetheless, X-20 could have moved us forward on both military and civilian fronts.

I think they've removed this but Boeing had on their website that cancelling X-20 (Dyna-Soar) was one of the worst mistakes we've made.

17 posted on 08/14/2011 9:32:22 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: decimon
There is also an argument that X-20 hadn't clear objectives. nonetheless, X-20 could have moved us forward on both military and civilian fronts.

I think they've removed this but Boeing had on their website that cancelling X-20 (Dyna-Soar) was one of the worst mistakes we've made.

Consider how the B2 has been used for around the world bombing missions for the past few years. And this year the B1 was used the same way. Imagine if we would have had a suborbital bomber for the past forty years.

18 posted on 08/14/2011 10:13:59 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: decimon
"If manned spaceflight shows results, it's useful. But if a person just wants to be in orbit, then I do not consider this to be a beneficial activity. There needs to be a return," Popovkin declared bluntly.

Coming from a government official—of any government—that statement is both staggering...and refreshing!

"There needs to be a return." Maybe some day our government officials will be caught on record saying things like that. Maybe even doing things like that!

19 posted on 08/19/2011 11:01:34 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson