The five largest tribes, comprising the bulk of Libyan population support Daffy. Infantry weapons were distributed to the population, including women. If Daffy was dictator as NATO and their terrorist allies claim, Daffy would be gone the moment population got the weapons. Or more logically, Daffy would never distributed it.
The fact is, Daffy has larger support base than Hussein.
We are watching botched arm robbery attempted by UKUSA and their AQ goons on the ground.
Taking Tripoli from several hundred thousand of armed and determined civilians would require Desert Storm-sized expedition force and NATO does not have it.
Their AQ scum is no fighting force and has 2000 bandits tops.
The pattern of fighting so far is quite telling. Libyan army retreats and scatter in small detachments. Armed civilians remain inside. AQ rebels (a.k.a rats) take bait and enter city. Civilians take them into the crossfire and kill as many as they can, army then returns. Trenches are dug and rats lured to capture them. then, trenches are filled with oil and set ablaze.
It seems that Daffy's Belarus and Russian instructors know the mentality of AQ terrorists quite well.
Libya is battle for the entire Africa, and NATO is not winning.
In desert warfare, as Rommel once posited, whoever controls the air, wins. In the past two weeks, "rebel" advances are quite note worthy. But only after having the ground "prepped" by NATO. Without air cover? The opposition would have been ground to dust months ago.
However, NATO will be reticent to use aerial arty in congested areas. Which brings the word "stalemate" to the front...