Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU Lawsuit Moves to Keep Sex Offenders in House Near New Day Care Center
FoxNews.com ^ | August 16, 2011 | By Todd Starnes

Posted on 08/16/2011 12:37:42 PM PDT by topher

The Delaware American Civil Liberties Union has filed court papers to stop sex offenders from being evicted from a safe house that is located near a new day care center.

The ACLU, along with an attorney representing the safe house and three sex offenders, has asked a judge to issue a temporary restraining order to prevent the city from evicting the residents.

“The state has asked the residents to leave, and if they don’t leave they will be arrested,” attorney Daniel Wolcott, Jr. told Fox News Radio.

Wolcott is representing the owner of the safe house and three sex offenders.

“The safe house has been there for a number of years and has been accepting registered sex offenders who are prohibited from living within 500 feet of a school,” he said.

Wolcott said there are two safe houses in question. One house was operating before the day care center opened for business. The other one was not. However, he said police said any sex offenders living at both houses would have to leave or face arrest.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: aclu; daycare; delaware; moralabsolutes; perverts; sexoffender
There will be dead little children if ACLU wins...

These perverts do not change...

1 posted on 08/16/2011 12:37:54 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: topher
“The safe house has been there for a number of years and has been accepting registered sex offenders who are prohibited from living within 500 feet of a school,” he said.

Yeah, like a 500 foot limit is going to prevent these perverts from molesting children.

If these convicted people cannot be trusted to be around children, then they should be on the streets period.

Molest a child, get executed or life without parole.

2 posted on 08/16/2011 12:42:13 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

47 Days And FR Is Still Short Of Its Goal

Name Another Site Where You Can Get As Much Information

Can't Think Of One?

Then Why Don't You Donate

3 posted on 08/16/2011 12:44:20 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

the day care center should never have been issued a license if the sex offenders were already there.

that said, if the sex offenders can’t be trusted, why are they allowed to be free?


4 posted on 08/16/2011 12:58:05 PM PDT by absolootezer0 (2x divorced tattooed pierced harley hatin meghan mccain luvin' REAL beer drinkin' smoker ..what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
then they should NOT be on the streets period.
5 posted on 08/16/2011 1:01:58 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Who is “safe” around this Safe House?


6 posted on 08/16/2011 1:07:14 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: topher

the ACLU need to watch their back


7 posted on 08/16/2011 1:08:28 PM PDT by Charlespg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Why do sex offenders need a “safe house?”

We are the ones who need to be kept safe. The safest place for them is prison.


8 posted on 08/16/2011 1:14:35 PM PDT by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Who is “safe” around this Safe House?

Good question.

I'm of the mind when a person gets convicted of a crime, does his time, the price has been pain in full.

Restoration of all rights should be restored upon completion of the proscribed sentence.

I also thing that child molesters should get life or executed, but we better be careful on how we define "child" molestation. IOW, a 19 year old bedding his 17 year old girl friend does not qualify as child molestation in my view, neither does a guy who gets caught relieving himself in an alley should be considered a sex off fender, forced to register for life.

We need to start applying some good old common sense.

JMHO

9 posted on 08/16/2011 1:21:29 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: topher

OK The ACLU ,has just assumed responsibility for these dregs!and should do the Jail time with them as well!


10 posted on 08/16/2011 2:24:58 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

My question is, why are they “tracked” if they have served their time? What a waste of taxpayer funds. I can just see them ramming through the same legislation for tax evaders, deadbeat dads and student loan defaulters.


11 posted on 08/16/2011 2:47:57 PM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer9
There is a database that shows sex offenders in your area. I don't think that it takes that much to maintain this.

Law enforcement uses this if something of a sex offense happens in that area, they will check on the sex offenders in the area. That might end up saving a victim's life (and I believe it has in the past).

A convicted felon must contact a parole officer when they get out of jail. I guess sex offenders must keep doing it.

Just as a convicted felon has lost certain rights, in a sense a sex offender has lost some rights.

If a child disappears in an area with a sex offended, police have been known to check the sex offenders (and I am pretty sure that have saved children's lives in the past).

12 posted on 08/16/2011 3:18:58 PM PDT by topher (Traditional values -- especially family values -- are the values that time has proven them to work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

Concur.

The day school should not have been issued a permit if that meant displacing the people who already were living nearby.

Reminds me of Miami where the only place the sex offenders could live was under a bridge.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104150499

I know their crimes are horrible and if it were up to me they’d be put to death. But it’s not and they’ve been put back into society and they need to live somewhere decent.

Seriously, we treat Islamic mass murderers better than this.

Maybe what’s needed is a new ‘Devil’s Island’ where we can banish these people and where they can live somewhat more freely than they do here.


13 posted on 08/16/2011 3:36:56 PM PDT by MeganC (Are you better off than you were four years ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: topher

I’d be willing to wager that no one in the diverse daycare permits department will be called to task on this snafu. promotions are most likely in order.


14 posted on 08/16/2011 7:46:47 PM PDT by printhead (Standard & Poor - Poor is the new standard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson