Posted on 08/18/2011 6:36:28 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
bump.
Barbara Streisand.
At 52%?
RE: At 52%?
I think that’s the voting percentage he got from the popular vote in 2008.
Blacks, Homo’s Liberals, view Obama favorably, because he is one of them .Democrats will vote for whoever the party puts in from of them, whether they like him or not.
That is the answer.
Hie likeability is zilch.
Americans still overwhelmingly like the guy.
That’s the biggest bunch of crap I’ve heard since I last saw him on TV.
This swanky vacation he is on should narrow the gap a bit.
Nascent noobs hate the bastard.
Beautiful graphs in visual display of quantitative information terms.
- - - - - -
In spite of being a communist fraud and puppet buttboy with no verifiable background, experience, or qualifications,
Øbama moved into 1600 only by 'virtue' of being (half) black.
His handlers cynically assessed the political climate and cashed in on:
1) idiotic white guilt
2) rampant black racism
3) massive electoral fraud
4) a voting population, a decisive % of whom are functionally illiterate or emotionally retarded or both.
End of.
Many people don’t want to admit they don’t like him, not even to themselves, for fear of being a racist.
Liked by?...and for what. Perhaps his Muslim Brotherhood staff still like him for his job of delivering them a Country.
Given how critical favorability ratings are to being a successful President, it’s hard to understand how the Founding Fathers neglected to include anything about it in Article II of the Constitution. Pretty negligent of them.
This swanky vacation he is on should narrow the gap a bit.
One would think so. I mentioned him going to Martha’s Vineyard in the middle of all that’s happening to a lib at work today and she replied “Bush probably took twice as many vacations”. It’s unbelievable.
RE: Given how critical favorability ratings are to being a successful President, it’s hard to understand how the Founding Fathers neglected to include anything about it in Article II of the Constitution. Pretty negligent of them.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
What’s should they have included? This I’d really like to read.
I was being sarcastic. Of course they had no way of doing modern-style opinion polls in 1787. I just have gotten tired of the way the media acts like popularity ratings are the criterion whether a policy or decision is good or bad. When Clinton was shown to have lied under oath, we were supposed to ignore it because his popularity ratings were still high. When Bush had low ratings, that was supposed to discredit anything he did.
Why? Landlines hadn't been overtaken by cell phones yet! Back then, a simple autodialer with a router to a call center might have worked well for the Tories, as they tried to understand their internals!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.