Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

He was referring to Nafta Trade when he referred to that vision.

You need to read the whole speech.

He also made a lot a qualifiers to that statement.

And it was not last year but much longer ago.
It was even before all of the violence and drug cartel problems.

Fox is not the president of Mexico any longer either.


33 posted on 08/21/2011 5:32:34 PM PDT by TexMom7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: TexMom7
"He was referring to Nafta Trade when he referred to that vision."

That's not bad enough?

In exchange for importing Ford trucks (and thousands of other manufactured goods...from workers paid $4/hr) we get duty-free tomatoes in December and green onions that give you the sh!ts.

The US does not benefit from NAFTA in any way.

Yes, there are BUSINESSES that benefit...and while lucrative, the balance is way out of whack.

The USA does not benefit from NAFTA. It's a net negative.

40 posted on 08/21/2011 5:45:37 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson