This PDS nonsense is just that. Nonsense. Just because other Conservatives prefer another Conservative candidate (NOT ROMNEY) doesn’t make them anti-Palin. Many just think other Conservatives in the race have a better chance, or find themselves more in agreement with some of the positions of the other Conservatives in the race.
A LOT of people have problems with Palin endorsing liberal women over the more Conservative males in the Republican primaries. IE: Karen Handel over Nathan Deal in Georgia.
A lot of people noted that Palin was totally absent in the Reid-Angle race as well.
Carly Fiorina over Chuck DeVore.
McCain over Hayworth
Absent for Angle.
No pattern there...
Sarah Palin has many fine attributes, but anybody who thinks she would govern as a conservative has not studied her record sufficiently. She understands hunting, 2A, resource extraction, and has a real distaste for crooks which are all to the good, but she also spent freely on frivolous feel-good projects while burdening oil producers with Byzantine taxation so that she could hand out "free money." It made her popular, but that is not conservatism. Her support for Party-anointed RINO candidates in nomination races is truly troubling.
I can see if you disagree with her, but no candiate is perfect they have all made mistakes, less we not forget that Palin made some great endorsemets and was a big fotce in the dem onslaught of 2010. I only called you on PDS because you got on a thread that had no realtion to Palin what so ever and you made it about Palin, does she really bother you that much?