Can he sue them out of existence or not? That’s all I want to know.
1. Reporter, who won Pulitzer Prize, claims he did adquate research. Yet he used "blogs" as source for research.
2. Only reason piece was done was to attack someone who is attacking Obama. Clearly, the NY Times has an agenda in place. They would not have allowed such shoddy journalism if the target was a liberal...
But a lawyer needs to comment on this...