[cuban leaf]

I’ll take it a step further. It has always amazed me that, with the constitution worded the way it is, that anyone could seriously suggest that somehow members of the press had more rights in areas like this than the rest of us.

Also, this is another nail in the MSM monopoly’s coffin.

[ml/nj]

It has always amazed me that, with the constitution worded the way it is, that anyone could seriously suggest that somehow members of the press had more rights in areas like this than the rest of us.

Moi aussi.

ML/NJ

[Tublecane]

“It has always amazed me that, with the constitution worded the way it is, that anyone could seriously suggest that somehow members of the press had more rights in areas like this than the rest of us.”

I’m confused. To what part of the constitution are you referring? Is videotaping the cops somehow speech? Is tape recording a cop covered under the 2nd amendment?