You know, that was simply uncalled for. I’ve seen this kind of stuff (regarded as “truther” by one side or the other) posted on threads about both Palin and Perry. I read threads about both because while my first choice is Palin, I think Rick Perry is worth a look. Facts can be twisted and that may be the case here (just like the facts behind Palin’s resignation usually are). But I bet it’s possible to point them out without insults. People who haven’t made up their mind (or will have to choose a different candidate because theirs has to drop out) read these threads and would probably prefer facts to name calling.
You are free to promote your candidate just as others are free to promote Bachmann, Cain, Palin, etc. But these are people who you agree with (probably most 100%) on issues important to ALL conservatives. Yet you somehow think it’s appropriate to call them “not bright” or “imaginative”. Things like “Palin/Perry Derangement Syndrome” are to be expected and there’s nothing wrong with that kind of ribbing. If you believe you’re so much better than them because of the candidate you support why not set a good example and act as if you are.
Cindie
“You are free to promote your candidate just as others are free to promote Bachmann, Cain, Palin, etc”
No one here was promoting anyone. All this thread was was yet another Perry-bash fest. Unless you are one of those that believes that bashing other candidates somehow makes your favorite look better?