Posted on 09/02/2011 10:32:22 AM PDT by Kaslin
Older people almost always seem to think they had it tougher than kids today do. So some older folks are striking back against the privileges enjoyed by todays young people. And this doesnt bode well for the future of society.
Consider a recent story out of Pennsylvania. The owner of a small restaurant outside Pittsburgh is banning children under the age of six, saying they regularly disrupted other customers meals, the Wall Street Journal reported recently. Ive decided someone in our society had to dig their heels in on this issue, the owner (a former teacher, luckily not of grammar) told reporters.
Well, its his restaurant, and if he wants to turn families away, thats his choice. And he doesnt seem to be facing a lot of pushback. The Journal reports that receipts at the restaurant are up, and notes: A poll on the website of a Pittsburgh TV news channel found 64 percent supported the under-six ban, compared with 26 percent who said it was a bad idea. About 10 percent said they didnt care. More than 10,000 people voted.
Meanwhile, CNN columnist LZ Granderson opines that this restaurant is on the right track. I don't know about you but I would gladly support an airline or restaurant that didn't make someone else's yelling, screaming, kicking offspring my problem, he writes. If you're the kind of parent who allows your 5-year-old to run rampant in public places like restaurants, I have what could be some rather disturbing news for you. I do not love your child. The rest of the country does not love your child either.
Maybe Im eating at the wrong restaurants. Ive had more flights and meals disrupted by unruly (drunk) adults than by uncontrolled children. Still, it seems obvious that many Americans have no patience for the idea that children will be children and are instead embracing the wisdom of the Middle Ages: children should be seen and not heard.
Ah, but they will be heard from eventually, and we may not enjoy hearing what theyll have to say. As journalist Michael Barone noted recently, Americans will soon depend on todays youngsters to pay for the countrys lavish retirement promises.
[U]nder Social Security, as with most public pension systems, current pensions are paid for by current workers. As lifespans increase and birth rates fall, the ratio of pensioners to active workers falls toward one-to-one, Barone warns.
Thats not enough to support the elderly in anything like the style to which they have been accustomed, unless tax rates are sharply increased. And sharply higher tax rates, as Western Europe has shown over the last three decades, reduce long-term economic growth. Thats the problem, often abbreviated as entitlements, facing our political system.
Still, many of todays political leaders oppose slowing the size and scope of federal entitlement spending. In May, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi told the Washington Post she would fight to ensure no benefits cuts in Medicare. It is a flag weve planted that we will protect and defend. We have a plan. Its called Medicare.
As for Social Security, Two decades from now, Im willing to take a look at it, Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid told MSNBC in March. But Im not willing to take a look at it right now. Earlier in the year he declared that changes to the program were off the table.
Keep in mind that, because parents are having fewer children, each of those youngsters is on the hook for a steadily-growing share of the federal budget deficit. Our social insurance programs have slowly created a massive and immoral shift of wealth and obligation from today's middle class to future generations, Stuart Butler of The Heritage Foundation warned in 2007. Medicare alone now has a $32 trillion unfunded obligation -- a tab that is being passed to our children and grandchildren. Medicare and Social Security together now constitute an unsecured mortgage of $170,000 placed in the crib of every newborn American. The tab Butler cites has only increased in the last four years.
When the time comes to pay that mortgage off, however, some of todays youngsters might decide to change the laws instead. If, for instance, Congress were to adjust the formula by which Social Security cost-of-living increases were calculated or change the age of eligibility, future federal liabilities would shrink by trillions of dollars instantly, John Steele Gordon noted recently in the Wall Street Journal.
The lesson? We can either put our own fiscal house in order by reducing the amount were promising in entitlement benefits to future retirees. Or wed better be nice to todays children, since were counting on them to be nice to us when theyre running the country in the decades ahead.
There was never any argument since you keep bringing in these irrelevancies just as you are now.
And I’ll have great evening!
Over 20 years of wandering the US with children, and I’ve never found an establishment other than a smoke shop, bar or liquor store that wanted to exclude them. (Rural bars would pretend not to notice, because there might be noplace else to get a Coke.) The only rude comments I’ve ever heard have been at church (some people DO hate children) or the doctor’s waiting room (when they were all sitting in a line doing math worksheets, too!).
In restaurants, the most common remark from staff and other customers is “What well-behaved children!” to which I generally respond, “Thank you. They were hungry!”
Of course, we haven’t been Up North in more than 20 years. Things might be different there.
Occasionally you run across a spoiled brat but it is usually being dealt with. I don't think people mind being around children that are going through a "stage" it is when the parents seem either helpless or indifferent that they become annoyed.
I have run into this type in Chicago in the past 10 years or so, usually in malls for some reason. The kicking incident happened at one of the restaurants where a group of us where waiting to be seated.
Miss Moppet ran up to one of the older ladies and kicked her while shrieking "Get out of the way!" Female Parental Unit, following behind smiled at us and said "She is so out going!" without even a hint of irony or apology.
I somehow don't see Miss Moppet growing up to be a contributing member of society.
Since I don't get to Chicago more the twice a year I can't say that I have seen it a lot but it does seem to be on the rise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.