Nice attempt at diversion, but it won’t work.
You can not compare being served on another’s property with being provided necessary services on your own property. There is no comparison.
Admit it, you support nanny state laws to prevent private property openers from making what they consider to be best business sense decisions because they inconvenience you.
“You can not compare being served on another’s property with being provided necessary services on your own property. There is no comparison.’
Yes, I can because the comparison was in the decision of a privately owned company not to provide service on specious grounds or just dislike of a certain person.
And no mind reading, thank you.