Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pearls Before Swine
Fiscally, Bush was profligate and inattentive. Nothing like Obama, but still...

When the GOP was in control of Congress, it seemed to do quite well:

GOP control of Congress = declining deficits. Let the Democrats get either chamber, and deficits increase. Get control of both, you get the meltdown that is today.

Note, too, that FY2009 was NOT signed by President Bush - he promised to veto it if Pelosi and Reid sent it to him. And thus they did not pass a budget until February 2009 and President Obama gladly signed it.

10 posted on 09/04/2011 11:08:31 AM PDT by FromTheSidelines ("everything that deceives, also enchants" - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FromTheSidelines

While I generally agree with your conclusions, every President has to deal with what comes up and what has developed over the past few years. If Bush had a third term, or McCain had won in 2008, there would have still been a very large deficit due to the housing/finance induced depression. That took many years to develop into it’s full-blown form—maybe 20 to 25.

Nevertheless, Dem congresses and Dem presidents make things worse. I don’t believe that McCain would have gone for a union/government employee directed Porkulus bill, although there would have been significant recession induced stimulus. And, I believe McCain (or Bush if he could have been in office) wouldn’t have gone crazy with job killing and energy killing over-regulation.


14 posted on 09/04/2011 11:17:08 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FromTheSidelines

While I generally agree with your conclusions, every President has to deal with what comes up and what has developed over the past few years. If Bush had a third term, or McCain had won in 2008, there would have still been a very large deficit due to the housing/finance induced depression. That took many years to develop into it’s full-blown form—maybe 20 to 25.

Nevertheless, Dem congresses and Dem presidents make things worse. I don’t believe that McCain would have gone for a union/government employee directed Porkulus bill, although there would have been significant recession induced stimulus. And, I believe McCain (or Bush if he could have been in office) wouldn’t have gone crazy with job killing and energy killing over-regulation.


15 posted on 09/04/2011 11:17:18 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FromTheSidelines
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Sorry but the financial crash was the Republicans' fault including Bush. They COULD have defunded Freddie and Fannie without the Democrats permission but they chose not to.

FR thread on this graph.

49 posted on 09/04/2011 12:29:16 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FromTheSidelines
Just replying so I'll remember where I saw that graph should I need it.
157 posted on 09/05/2011 11:01:37 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: FromTheSidelines

http://keithhennessey.com/2010/11/18/president-george-w-bushs-spending-record/


162 posted on 09/08/2011 4:30:29 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson