Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o
There is no need for him to be there. We use electronic conferencing technology all the time, he can too.

There's a bit of difference between your online meetings and vying for POTUS. Perry would be giving up a lot to appear remotely. No candidate would ever do such a thing.

Wait a minute here, 99.999 percent of the audience is watching this remotely electronically on the tube.

When questions are asked of Perry, they could just switch to his live feed. What's the problem with that?

BTW, it wouldn't be "on-line". It would be a direct television feed right into his office, or where ever he wanted it. They've been doing this with television for decades.

181 posted on 09/06/2011 5:51:02 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: dragnet2
They've been doing this with television for decades.

I do understand that. What I am driving at, or at least trying to, is a subliminal impression that I believe would be made of any candidate not physically present with the rest. I believe he (or she) would be seen as "less than" the ones who are there.

He / she would lose some advantage of being able to gauge his opponents body language and other visua; and non-verbal cues that are useful in a debate.

Does that make sense?

188 posted on 09/06/2011 5:58:16 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson