"Paul’s ad praised Reagan, and attempted to link Paul to Reagan. Of course, Ron Paul trashed Reagan as a “failure” in 1988, making the ad for him completely disingenuous." No, I think it's that you don't understand the word 'disingenuous.' Disingenous would be Perry running as an anti-illegal immigration candidate, when he's basically been Mr. Dream Act and Mr. Arizona-is-bad and Mr. Sanctuary City--right up until this last year, when suddenly he's Mr. Enforcement. He's Vicente Fox's best pal
and LaRaza's point man
, but now, he's Mr. Enforcement? LOL! Better check your Webster's, 'cause I'm pretty sure Mitt Perry's picture is next to the word "disingenuous" in the dictionary.
I find it amusing that you claimed that I didn’t know the meaning of the word disingenuous, which I used perfectly, and then went into an entire spiel about Perry being disingenuous, which was irrelevant to my point.
I am not a Perry supporter, and I believe that he is an opportunist.
That doesn’t mean that Paul is not being disingenuous when he attempts to tie himself to Reagan.
By all means, point out Perry’s own hypocrisies. You don’t have to tear down my critique of a Paul ad in order to do so.
For the record, I am a Palin supporter.