[oh8eleven]

allegedly driving with faulty taillights
I note that this is written where the only action "alleged" is driving with the faulty tail lights.
Everything the cops did was written as fact.
Not justifying anything - just seems to be a "little" bias in the story.

[cizinec]

That’s not bias. If the paper had said, “driving with faulty tail lights” and this wasn’t proven in court, the family could potentially sue for libel. If he wasn’t convicted, it’s *alleged*, and that is correct in a legal system that supposedly presumes innocence, even for minor traffic violations.