Lots of drugs, lots of blood, lots of DNA, lots of knives and footprints all together, lots of lies exposed as lies, lots of lawyering and money from mom and dad, lots of time for political pressure and payoffs.
And one very bloody, butchered, dead victim right smack in the middle of all of it.
But hey, Amanda's got nice tits and acts crazy, so let her go.
“Lots of drugs”
Irrelevant.
“lots of blood”
Yeah, it was a murder. Anything tying her blood to it, or any blood on her? You know, actual evidence of her guilt, rather than something happening where she lived.
“lots of DNA”
Same issues.
“lots of knives”
Everyone has knives, big deal. Which was the murder weapon? Do they even know?
“lots of lies exposed as lies”
Blah, blah, blah.
“lots of lawyering and money from mom and dad”
Irrelevant.
“lots of time for political pressure and payoffs”
On which end? You can use corruption as an excuse all you want for why she may be let go, but doesn’t it work just as well for why she was convicted in the first place?
“one very bloody, butchered, dead victim right smack in the middle of all of it”
Duh.
“But hey, Amanda’s got nice tits and acts crazy, so let her go.”
You have it the wrong way around. This, plus the fact that she was a foreigner, is why she was convicted. Well, more nice face than nice “tits,” as her tits have not become public to my knowledge.