Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
Fortunately for Rubio, this is nothing more than a bunch of crap birthers made up.

Call me any name you want, but he's still ineligible. Read Minor v. Happersett. Read John Bingham.

18 posted on 09/07/2011 5:01:13 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: buccaneer81
Call me any name you want, but he's still ineligible. Read Minor v. Happersett. Read John Bingham.

I've read all the birther talking points. Nobody's buying any of it.

25 posted on 09/07/2011 5:08:42 PM PDT by Drew68 (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: buccaneer81

Minor v Happersett suggests that the Constitution does not define natural born, and that while there may be doubts on whether children born in the US to non citizens are natural born or not, the court would not rule on that.

So they did not confirm or deny natural born status to children born in the US to non-citizens, as that was not the point of the case. All the result of that case does is keep the argument going, but it is not anything final.


54 posted on 09/07/2011 5:33:11 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: buccaneer81
Call me any name you want, but he's still ineligible. Read Minor v. Happersett. Read John Bingham.

Rubio is ineligible. As is Obama, but who cares about the Constitution or that the Messiah's birth certificate is phony.

100 posted on 09/07/2011 7:08:40 PM PDT by Stepan12 (Palin & Bolton in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson