Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

realistically, the screening is simply a bunch of questions anyways...if theyre not testing the blood, shame on em...


13 posted on 09/08/2011 6:51:02 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gilbo_3

Of course, people can lie. But they’d be lying. And they’ll have to lie directly in the face of donation personnel. That’s the point. Some will have enough moral fiber left in them to tell the truth or not donate at all. It’s a screen, which is not foolproof, but has some positive effect anyway.


17 posted on 09/08/2011 6:56:16 AM PDT by fwdude ("When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Gilbo_3

They probably do test the blood, but the test doesn’t always detect the virus if the donor was only recently infected. There was talk a while back of loosening the standards in the US as well. Bad news for anyone who might need a blood transfusion.


19 posted on 09/08/2011 7:04:26 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson