Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JDW11235
There are hundreds of trillions of dollars worth of value in the 30% of the nation owned directly by the federal government.

Sell it, mortgage it, or rent it out.

At the moment entitlements are NOT the problem with the federal budget. In the future they could be. The national patrimony can be used to back up all the federal obligations with ease.

12 posted on 09/08/2011 8:41:05 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

You know good and damn well he is going after all the prosperity God has bequeathed us. His dog don’t hunt at all.


13 posted on 09/08/2011 8:44:34 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah

There is no money, but there are assets, you are absolutely correct. Sell them off, pay out a lump some, and get rid of the idiocy. Entitlements are ALWAYS a problem with the budget (though I understand the spirit of your statement), because there is no constitutional basis for it, and the moneis supposed to be used for them are all gone. It’s like saying the ever increasing fee’s on your increasing number of payday loans (like our 40% debt service) aren’t the problem because your still making payments, and you have things to sell. Sure that may be true now, but unlike that simple (payday loan) example, the actions that the government takes don’t just eat up a portion of the income, they also hinder/stifle the current market. People have less money to save/produce/invest when taxes into financial oblivion which snowballs.

Another FReeper posted an article about something called the “Theory of Snowballs” or something to the effect, which talks about how many (most in the authors view) things in life happen and change at an exponential rate that is imperceptible for a long time, and then very, very sudden. That’s what’s happening now, because the more money we borrow for the general fund, the more interest we have, meaning the less money we have, so the more we are taxes, which decreases the revenue, causing a further need to borrow and a higher interest payment. It’s simple math. Better to pay out the obligations, take the hit now, and fix what’s broken, than to justify the broken system and try to save it (thus increasing the exponential rate at which it grows). That’s what I’m trying to get across, but I completely agree with you post, that we have the funds to back it.

Remember where there is little incentive to produce, nothing gets produced, that is the problem we face today, and it is ALWAYS the INEVITABLE outcome of ANY form of Socialism. Always. No matter how trivial anything can seem or how easy it is to sell as paying for your future (SS), it’s only the camel’s nose in the tent.


15 posted on 09/08/2011 8:52:45 AM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson