Posted on 09/08/2011 11:58:25 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Uh, no. Doubt she'd accept any "pick" from Perry unless he were actually sitting in the Oval Office and told her she had to take it, to save the country, or something.
Sarah loses, she goes home to Alaska, and Perry does whatever Perry was going to do, which doesn't include naming people like Palin to anything.
Perry likes RiNO's and soft-moderate Mexican-American Republicans of "some description" with lots of ties to the Bidness Community. That's who Rick likes. People named by his backers, no doubt -- that's who Rick does business with, whoever Mr. Big tells him to.
Oooooooof! That's harsh.
{^)
There. How's that?
New York Times editorial staff passed 50% gay/bi maybe 10 years ago (interpolating from remarks by one of their own -- they were at 75% gay/bi five years agos), and the gay presence in media is absolutely huge, people have no idea. Totally overrepresented, with a total veto practically everywhere over news content, editorial lines, everything.
Okay, thanks, they’d already been in the WH for 4 years and most people new there were differences at this point.
Cindie
Nope. I remember. We didn’t know that Cheney supported gay marriage.
Huh? How did you go from stay-at-home dads (a role my dad played for three months out of the year almost all the time I was growing up) to it being the equivalent of condoning homosexual couples "parenting" children?
Wha ...???
You don't like Palin, fine. But really ... surely you can find something more substantial than this ridiculous "concern" to justify your objections to her?
I watched the video this morning and it was pretty dull. it didnt match this thread theme at all. This looks like creating something out of nothing.
Like : “I will NEVER vote for Bachmann because .... said.....” Someone should compile a single list of everyone in media or politics who supposedly dissed Sarah by issuing a non-worship comment.
Uh, sorry, J.D. Hayworth had major slimeball issues of his own (you know, like personal honesty) that offered any number of reasons for anyone to support the incumbent. Hayworth stank, Palin endorsed her political benefactor and sometime sponsor.
Twist that anyway you like, your own biases are showing like stripes on a zebra.
Who did you say your candidate was, again, and why he or she displays more character than Palin?
I think Perry has a crush on Palin look at how he looks at her. Nugent has a normal look Perry just has that look beyond admiration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z75yHEy98wY
LOL!!! Oh, man, yer killin' me!! Stop! {^)
Man o manischevitz ... the behavior and arguments of some Palin detractors speaks volumes about their mindsets!
jla, I'll bet you couldn't handle one week of trying to make a living in the commercial fishing industry, due to the physical demands alone. And being successful in that work requires a lot more than the physical ability to catch fish.
Keep posting -- Palin detractors like you, who can only put up petty and ignorant objections to Palin, are wonderful ambassadors for Palin in that a thinking person yet on the fence looks at your "style" and thinks, "Gosh, if that's what I'd be throwing in with if I decide to oppose Palin, maybe I ought to head in the opposite direction."
A clear sign of a bot is when they respond to a non-personal critical comment with accusations of : ‘xxx-hater’ or ‘XDS’. Just this morning I got called a ‘Perry-hater’ for commenting on the Texas Dream act on a promote-Perry thread,
I pointed out how I was amazed how the (some) Perry-bots are copying the (some) Palin-bots talking points so closely , but the (some) Palin-bots started out by copying the Bush-bots ~2009 to 2010.
slide the video to about 2:37.
Hint: When you see that it's a PALIN THREAD, you're MORE than welcome to STEER CLEAR since you seem to find them so OBJECTIONABLE.
SSDD. Next question.
Doncha love me today? Go see this go see that LOL Slide this one to 2:10 oh the horror the actual TRUTH!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo941anwtZk
Man oh man, I want you on my side if I'm in trouble!
This thread was an attempt to bash Perry on behalf of Palin. The headline was changed to reflect the bias of the poster.
All this does is further erode support for Gov. Palin. Tearing down a good candidate for someone who is not even running is a sure fire way to help the other side.
Thank you!
She and I disagree strongly about Juan. As HIS VP nominee, however, she had no choice but to endorse him front and center. It should comfort you to know that Hayworth ruined any chance that he had by appearing as a shill in that lying infomercial. Bob
I did not "go from stay at home dads". Someone else suggested that. What I do maintain that the best is the mother in the home. I don't really have much to say about all the second best situations.
You don't like Palin, fine. But really ... surely you can find something more substantial than this ridiculous "concern" to justify your objections to her?
Because it seems "ridiculous" to you does not negate it being yet another potential negative for Palin. It's a negative for a subset of the folks she needs to attract, and it may well be used as ammo by her opponents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.