Maybe instead you could concentrate on saying why those Perry critiques are wrong or off base.
Implying that Palin is acting like Perry does nothing to deflect the criticisms.
Some of them are right on.
Implying that Palin is acting like Perry does nothing to deflect the criticisms.
In what way did I do that? Palin and Perry are both espousing the exact same policy positions. Perry is obviously more electable than Palin as her negatives (whether she deserves them or not) are literally through the roof. So why is it that the rabid Palin-Onlyists on this forum are so committed to destroying Perry?
Palin isn't even running. Yet her supporters will destroy anyone who gets in her way.
I have merely pointed out the hypocrisy of the rabid Palin supporters and not surprisingly they refuse to acknowledge her blemishes.
Of course it deflects criticism, because it causes me to think about how perfect any conservative really is.
There is none perfect, no not one.
Therfore, we are insane to kill our own to defend our favorite.
We end up with a bunch of dead candidates, and the enemy walks on to victory.
Then we get Obama or Obama-lite (Romney).
Like you were asked earlier, what basic conservative positions do Palin and Perry differ on? Not any fiscal issues, not on life, not on God, not on guns, not on big government, not on marriage and family, not on a strong America, not on our military, and on and on and on.
They differ a bit perhaps on how to deal with border security and with illegals already here, but I don't know.
Are we going to destroy Perry so he can never be senator from Texas? Or Palin so she can never be senator from Alaska?
Will that help us take back the senate some day?