Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grunthor
“Certainly, poor people did pretty well,” Matthews replied. “That’s the idea.”

So...communism.

Poorer people have fared well, because there's a lot of productivity in the system right now, or at least there had been. But communism has not historically treated people well; if anything, communism assures that if one person is living in misery, everyone will be living in misery!

12 posted on 09/09/2011 7:21:02 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Lou L

The point I was making was; “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”


14 posted on 09/09/2011 7:29:21 AM PDT by Grunthor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson