Posted on 09/12/2011 6:44:32 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
It all depends on how conditions appear next year and whether Republicans nominate a good candidate.
I predict a 49 state landslide for Rick Perry...
Is it just me...or does Mitt Romney resemble Bob Dole?
Total k|`@|).
'rats are red through and through.
One thing for sure, Illinois will never go to a Republican.
Other Freepers have made that point about the color scheme. History is on your side. It’s unfortunate that the colors assigned have been stamped onto the national conciousness.
I don’t accept them.
Strong economic growth? Not likely. Any increase in obama’s popularity will scare the crap out of business and the markets. In effect, this will act as a thermostat. Businesses are holding their breath.
Mitt Romney is the latest pro New Deal, pro Great Society candidate. He’ll do what he has to to destroy any real conservatives to get the support of the powers that be, who will then abandon him to support the democrat. We’ve seen his like any number of times.
It all depends on whether the GOP nominee blows bubbles with his drool. If he refrains, he will be elected in a landslide and it won’t be close.
I mean look at it this way: If a Pub can’t win against an unpopular President with 9% unemployment, $6-8T in new debt, taxes set to go up, a double-dip recession, etc., then a Pub will never win.
Originally the dims were red and republicans were blue. Sometime in the late seventies they flipped the colors around. Back then, there were only the big three networks and they realized that the red comparison would not be good for their agenda.
I agree this is possible, and very likely at the least, because as Larry Sabato wrote:
Unexpectedly strong economic growth could make Obamas reelection path much easier than it currently looks to be.
Unexpectedly strong ecomonic growth? BWAH HA HA!
I found some old videos on YouTube of 1980 election coverage - looks like Reagan’s states were blue and Carter’s red in that election. In 1984 and every election since then in the election coverage, Republicans have been colored red and Democrats blue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTMpQqDP-nk - 1980 coverage video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev_9YcM-HNI - 1984 coverage - video
Republican Wildcat is correct. It flipped between '80 and '84. Check his post #14. In '96 they were already showing dems blue, Pubs red.
Blue was used for the party holding the White House and red for the challenger.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
That's the way I remember it.
Now the colors need to be reversed whenever possible, rather than to roll over and go along.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.