Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poundstone

Retirement may not be the best option, especially if you’re still relatively young (late fifties, early-to-mid sixties). I wouldn’t assume that the value of your retirement as it presently stands will remain the same. Better to continue working and saving. At sixty, you might well last another thirty to thirty-five years.


5 posted on 09/13/2011 8:33:02 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham

Good point. Of course, if you can get a full retirement package at, say, age 55, and then get a good full-time private sector job, that’s probably the best of both worlds.


6 posted on 09/13/2011 8:36:22 AM PDT by Poundstone (A recent Federal retiree and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Many government pension systems are the result of a corrupt deal between elected officials and government employees. The politicians obtain political support in exchange for the promise of lavish but unfunded benefits. The future taxpayers who have to pay those benefits are not party to the deal, are not morally bound by it, and should not be legally bound to it either. So, if I were a government employee, I wouldn’t be thinking of my retirement as 100% fixed or guaranteed.


7 posted on 09/13/2011 8:38:35 AM PDT by TheConservator ("I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson