Yeah that one. The one which turned out to be correct.
You got it.
Jumped right on this gossip though, didn't they. Wonder why? Hmmmm. Naw! The MSM hasn't become tabloid press, have they? *snicker*
The WaPo is selective in the scandal it prints and has an agenda.
Who new?
The words "hit piece" and "untrue" are not synonymous words. Try not to confuse them.
The fact that the Washington Post is no friend of conservatives and might enjoy embarrassing Sarah Palin does not negate the veracity of the Enquirer's story, any more than their tardiness (I'll take your word for it) with the Edwards story proved its veracity.
In this case they are.
So you are foolish enough to believe this. That's too bad. If this was anywhere NEAR true it would have been found by the MSM 3 years ago when they were paying big bucks for smears. And then there's Nick Broomfield's tripe. He never heard a breath of this either. Went all the way to Egypt to talk to a grade school classmate. Left no pebble unturned. But golly! A discredited author comes up with gossip and, well, it's just GOTTA be true!
Pardon me while I laugh. A lot.