Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: i88schwartz
Because we are not a democracy but have a representative government, technically she is correct. We elect people to represent us and to make decisions on the governmental level. Even the hated EPA(spit) was put into place by elected officials

If we don't like the decisions they are making we vote them out and put representatives in that more reflect our values. That is why elections are so important.

Constitutionally we are "doing this together".

I don't agree with how she said it; it comes across as arrogant and elitist.

We do need to take this country back, though.

11 posted on 09/14/2011 9:36:49 AM PDT by bubbacluck (Proud Hobbit with no intention of going back to Middle Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: liege

Constitutionally we are “doing this together”.

The Federal Government is way way way beyond the bounds of the Constitution.


14 posted on 09/14/2011 9:38:47 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: liege

I agree for the most part, except where you say its being done ‘constitutionally’. I don’t think many taxes, laws, regulations, etc are being done constitutionally (and I think most FReepers agree). Instead there are things being done in spite of the constitution, most specifically wrt state and individual rights, through congressional and executive overreach.

However the elected and subsequent appointed officials are not challenging this unconstitutional behavior, so yes, we must vote them out. This includes our state legislatures, whose job, I feel, includes making challenges to the feds on states rights. Not to mention states should get out of the fed’s state welfare trough.

Senators should still be appointed by the state’s legislature. That was a major crime against the states and the original intent of the constitution.

But, apart from people who seem in some ways extreme (i.e., Ron Paul) I am always left feeling that most ‘viable’ political candidates give the constitutionality issues lip service.

This is why we do need a third party. But as I posted many months ago, the third party should only operate as a principled caucus within congress, and should NOT try to push for a presidential candidate, but get the GOP candidate to acknowledge and agree to act on their issues with constitutional violations.

and then there’s the SCOTUS


35 posted on 09/14/2011 10:13:36 AM PDT by jbp1 (be nice now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson