Posted on 09/14/2011 12:26:18 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Okay, someone had better ‘fess up. Democrats lost a House seat in New York City, Barack Obama dropped below majority job approval in California, and now Senate Democrats are attacking Obama’s proposal to raise taxes to pay for Porkulus II: Economic Boogaloo. Did we flip over to the Terran Empire last night? And why do I have a goatee?
As he demands Congress quickly approve his ambitious proposal aimed at reviving the sagging economy, many Democrats on Capitol Hill appear far from sold that the president has the right antidote to spur major job growth and turn around their party’s political fortunes.
“Terrible,” Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) told POLITICO when asked about the president’s ideas for how to pay for the $450 billion price tag. “We shouldn’t increase taxes on ordinary income. … There are other ways to get there.”
“That offset is not going to fly, and he should know that,” said Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu from the energy-producing Louisiana, referring to Obama’s elimination of oil and gas subsidies. “Maybe it’s just for his election, which I hope isn’t the case.”
“I think the best jobs bill that can be passed is a comprehensive long-term deficit-reduction plan,” said Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), discussing proposals to slash the debt by $4 trillion by overhauling entitlement programs and raising revenue through tax reforms. “That’s better than everything else the president is talking about — combined.”
And those are just the moderates in the party. Some liberals also have concerns.
The concern that liberals have is mainly about extending the temporary payroll-tax cut, and they have a point. That reduces the amount of revenue flowing into an already-teetering Social Security system in an effort to make up the difference by fueling economic growth. Unfortunately, that didn’t actually work, because the tax relief was temporary and too small to boot. Extending the cut may sound good to workers and to Republicans who like tax cuts in principle, but it’s the same kind of short-term gimmickry that has characterized Obamanomics all along. And it makes Social Security that much more difficult to fix in any reform effort, too.
It’s also interesting to note that both Webb and Landrieu aren’t facing voters next year. Webb’s seat is up but Webb won’t be defending it; Landrieu won her last election in 2008 and won’t have to defend the seat until 2014. Carper comes from as safe a state for a Democrat as can be found, so while he has to campaign for re-election in 2012, he’s not going to be terribly concerned about his chances in deep-blue Delaware — unless the 2012 election turns into such a bloodbath that no Democrat is safe.
And if these relatively safe Democrats are bailing on the jobs bill, or at least its pay-fors, then what can we expect from endangered Democrats like Ben Nelson (NE), Claire McCaskill (MO), Ben Nelson (FL), or even Bob Casey (PA), whose state went all Republican in 2010? Obama wants to paint House Republicans as obstructionists so that he can make the do-nothing Congress argument in 2012, but that strategy will fail spectacularly if his own party refuses to consider the bill in the Senate. If that happens, the only Barack Obama serving a second term in office will have a goatee.
Elections have consequences. Some sooner than later.
Does anyone believe that he believed it would pass? It’s a campaign ploy to make Republicans look bad.....that’s it. American’s are wising up to this guy. It’s about time.
Betcha Obama will have a DemocRAT challenger and it will probably be Hillary.
The Democrat brand name is crap right now. Only a moron would want to lead the Dem ticket next year in what appears to be another 2010-type slaughter in the making.
Except their entire party is so corrupt they’ll do anything to try and remain in control to keep their skeletons buried.
Fourteen months away from the election is an eternity in politics - anything can happen. Don’t forget that Soros owns most of the media and they will follow his marching orders to get behind Mickey Mouse if it becomes apparent that Obama doesn’t have a prayer of winning.
The future of the Supreme Court is at stake and the left will NEVER give up fighting with all their might to win at any cost.
My point was Hillary has only one shot at running for president. Will she do it in what bodes to be a horrible year for Dems, or will she hunker down and hope 2016 will be a more favorable year? My bet is she holds out for 2016.
“Fourteen months away from the election is an eternity in politics - anything can happen. Don’t forget that Soros owns most of the media and they will follow his marching orders to get behind Mickey Mouse if it becomes apparent that Obama doesn’t have a prayer of winning.
The future of the Supreme Court is at stake and the left will NEVER give up fighting with all their might to win at any cost”. So what ? Because they wish it does not make it so. They can be had . Everyone knows the ugly truth about the Great and Powerful O . Just words.
Aren’t we still waiting on how this bill will be paid for?
You act like I’m trying to argue. I’m just making points of how determined and corrupt Dems are and that they will DO ANYTHING to hold onto Presidential and some congressional power.
I know they can be had and pray they will be. 2012 can’t get here fast enough to suit me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.