Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HereInTheHeartland

But that is my point: She did not have the sense to check it out.

When she is President, is she going to go with an idea just because someone says its true?

You have to know that is not a good plan.

She pulled the age old, “I met a guy who said....” BS that many politicans do.

The other things she does is tell you what she voted for when discussing an issue. Usually, it was voting for a bill that was defeated. Politicians think that matters to people.

It doesn’t.

She is toast. Get out the jelly.


57 posted on 09/14/2011 8:21:37 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ok, just to review. Here is a list of things that are NOT rights: A home, Health care, and a job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

She should have stuck with hammering on the mandate, IMHO. It is up to the public and their representatives to debate the merits of things like vaccinations. To have a chief executive issue an EO that mandates something (arguments about opt out aside) does raise legitimate questions of conduct in office.


65 posted on 09/14/2011 8:28:21 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson