To: bestintxas
You might expect all those Woodward & Bernstein wannabes in the media would be leading with stories about corruption at DOJ but they have the more pressing national matter of Sarah Palin's alleged tryst with Glenn Rice to focus their crusading journalist aspirations.
17 posted on
09/15/2011 9:26:10 AM PDT by
Dahoser
(Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
To: Dahoser
You might expect all those Woodward & Bernstein wannabes in the media would be leading with stories about corruption at DOJ but they have the more pressing national matter of Sarah Palin's alleged tryst with Glenn Rice to focus their crusading journalist aspirations. I can only imagine the frenzy if one changed 'Rice' to 'Beck'...
19 posted on
09/15/2011 11:22:53 AM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Dahoser
Of 106 supposedly apolitical hires by the Obama/Holder Civil Rights Division, all 106 are demonstrably, irrefutably leftist activists. Again, these are for "career" slots for which no political bias is supposed to be used to hire them. (they are civil service jobs, not political positions) Simple random distribution would assure than in a center-right country, at least a couple of dozen of these hires would be either right of center or at least apolitical -- but not a single one has been anything but a hard-left radical.
Where, oh where are the New York Times and the Washington Post? This is a direct violation of the law that these "news" organizations are deliberately ignoring.
44 posted on
09/22/2011 9:54:30 AM PDT by
WOBBLY BOB
(See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson