Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Debate Is Still Trapped In '20s Thinking
IBD Editorials ^ | September 16, 2011 | The great THOMAS SOWELL

Posted on 09/16/2011 4:06:22 PM PDT by Kaslin

Ninety years ago — in 1921 — federal income tax policies reached an absurdity that many people today seem to want to repeat. Those who believe in high taxes on "the rich" got their way. The tax rate on people in the top income bracket was 73% in 1921.

On the other hand, the rich also got their way: They didn't actually pay those taxes.

The number of people with taxable incomes of $300,000 a year and up — equivalent to far more than a million dollars in today's money — declined from more than a thousand people in 1916 to less than three hundred in 1921. Were the rich all going broke?

It might look that way. More than four-fifths of the total taxable income earned by people making $300,000 a year and up vanished into thin air. So did the tax revenues that the government hoped to collect with high tax rates on the top incomes.

What happened was no mystery to Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon. He pointed out that vast amounts of money that might have been invested in the economy were instead being invested in tax-exempt securities, such as municipal bonds.

Missing Money

Secretary Mellon estimated that the amount of money invested in tax-exempt securities had nearly tripled in a decade. The amount of this money that the tax collector couldn't touch was larger than the federal government's annual budget and nearly half as large as the national debt. Big bucks went into hiding.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: taxes

1 posted on 09/16/2011 4:06:24 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Big bucks went into hiding.

They always do except during the rut.


2 posted on 09/16/2011 4:08:44 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bm


3 posted on 09/16/2011 4:12:13 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Personal income taxes started in 1913 with the 16th amendment. I understand that personal rates started at about 5%.

In less than 10 years they had skyrocketed to 73% “on the wealthy”.

Is there nothing that the government touches that is not a complete failure?

4 posted on 09/16/2011 4:14:03 PM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson