Replies

Oops...I should have been more specific.

IMO FWIW ETC...When I say ‘left’ I’m more referring to the globalist left than the Dems (though I believe the Dems ‘are’ largely responsible). Here’s why.

The Globalist Left needed a scapegoat that they can get behind and one they could fully exploit to destroy American culture, belief systems and identity from within.

Islam/Muslims fit the bill because the Secular nature of the G/Left allowed them to pit Islam against their biggest obstacle - Christianity. Witness just as a small example how Islamic issues are taught in school while Christian issues have become verboten...things like that - incremental and everpresent.

Also, go back to Desert Storm. I will forever believe that ‘Refugee’ and ‘persecuted’ Muslims imported into America were the ‘bargaining chip’ that Bush 1 had to accept in order to get the ‘coalition’ support he wanted. Same for Bush 2. Clinton was no stranger to bringing them in in quantity either.

So it’s been going on for some time (at the ‘mass’ level) and that ‘mass’ keeps increasing. Also, the UK left now admits doing exactly that - importing Muzzies to alter social/political structure.

For the damage they can inflict, no, not in the ‘wholesale’ sense I agree, but a thousand determined and spread out jihadis will devastate our morale and lives once they cut loose, short term...until we strike back and end them. Just the threat today causes people to shut their businesses down and turn their worlds upside down. When a couple schools get bombed or malls machine-gunned, it will have a tremendous effect.

But you are very correct in the boogeyman aspect as well for the reasons I just mentioned and others, such as the TSA crap etc. No argument there at all.