[miss marmelstein]

Every time one of you Perry-camp followers trash Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann, you only make me more resistant to the idea of a Perry presidecy. I refuse to participate in the destruction of a Conservative woman because of some puffed-up Texas politican. In that regard, there is no point in posting to me.

[CajunConservative]

This isn't about "some puffed up Texas politician" but about a presidential candidate who is in a major meltdown and doesn't have the sense to stop. Good god we are electing someone who will have access to the football and other nasty toys that only the POTUS gets to play with.

[CharlesWayneCT]

I’m a Sarah Palin supporter. But if I based my support for her on what I see from some of her supporters, I might well have changed my mind.

It is irrational to decide on candidates based on what people claiming to support candidates say here at FR.

[beandog]

I so agree with you. It has sickened me they way these two women have been thrown under the bus because some Freepers have a new shiny toy.

If this is an indication of who Perry attracts as a supporter, it makes me uneasy voting or supporting him.

[listenhillary]

Cool. Another one bites the dust.

[RobertClark]

Every time one of you Perry-camp followers trash Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann, you only make me more resistant to the idea of a Perry presidecy. I refuse to participate in the destruction of a Conservative woman because of some puffed-up Texas politican. In that regard, there is no point in posting to me.

I, as a Perry supporter could not agree with you more, with an understanding that the inverse holds true: Every time Bachmann hurls personal attacks and arguments rooted in conjecture at Perry, a lot of people (not just Perry supporters) are more resistant to a Bachmann presidency.

Infighting will give us another weak ticket. If we stick to economy, jobs, debt - and what differentiates the (R) candidates on these issues, then we have already won the election. We cannot afford to hand it to Zero.