Posted on 09/19/2011 11:58:20 AM PDT by To-Whose-Benefit?
excuse me that’s T_H_A_L_I_D_O_M_I_D_E
Or triss. Or MTBE, or ...
What about birth control related deaths? Blood clots huge risk in this method of medicine. I have some friends that have put their daughters on various birth control pills to reduce cramping or normalize menstrual cycles. Additionally, this has been documented to help in preventing breast cancer. But there are risks, should all birth control pills be taken off the market? From my own experience, after starting the pill I developed toxic shock syndrome, was it from the pill or it was from some other source like a tampon? It is easy to manipulate things to fit what you want them to, but people should have more common sense.
It might be helpful to consider just WHO the FDA thinks it’s protecting, too.
http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/default.htm
What about the cancer patient who wants that experimental drug that is working in Europe but can’t get it here? Do you think this law would help them? Or is it a huge conspiracy where drug companies are out to kill Americans for a buck? Do you know how ridiculous you sound?
OK
This line, which appears at the beginning of the article is designed simply to frighten people.
As of June 22, 2011, approximately 35 million doses of Gardasil® were distributed in the U.S. . . .
Without the context provided in the second line above, which appears 9 lines below the first line above, the reader is left to generate for themselves that this vaccine is sinister at best. It's amazing to me how easy it is to manipulate information to obtain the public response desired.
” It’s amazing to me how easy it is to manipulate information to obtain the public response desired.”
Yes it is. Just like those 68, FDA Safe & Effective Deaths don’t appear to unduly Bother some whose own child isn’t Among those “Well, that’s just the Price somebody Else has to have shoved down Their throat by Govt, Progress 68”.
my only question with your post is the word “distributed” that does not necessarily mean given...
“Bachmann called Perry’s use of the Executive Order an abuse of his executive power.”
That was her main message, and why I fear Perry would be a nanny-state president, who would abuse Executive Orders.
“should all birth control pills be taken off the market?”
Pro-life women might not want to use birth control pills.
“”Birth Control” Pills cause early Abortions
By J.T. Finn (updated April 23, 2005)
Physicians across America — and around the world — are now confirming that the Pill, IUDs, Depo-Provera and Norplant cause early abortions.
First, a look at the Pill. Research shows that in many cases the Pill causes early abortions — abortions the mother may not even know she’s having.”
excerpt http://www.prolife.com/BIRTHCNT.html
Natural Family Planning, NOT to be confused with the rhythm method, is as effectice as the pill, and doesn’t cause women to have blood clots.
“Bachmann called Perry’s use of the Executive Order an abuse of his executive power.”
That was her main message, and why I fear Perry would be a nanny-state president, who would abuse Executive Orders.”
All 3 Branches have been doing Whatever they felt like doing for far too long, and That is what created the culture of “Oh Well, Whatever” which got us stuck with the One last time.
They all need to be herded back onto the Constitutional Reservation and not given any more Executive Role Models who simply fine tune through Executive Order whenever they deem it expedient.
What if we get another Executive Order scribbler with an R on it next year?
Are they going to write Executive Orders closing down the Depts of Ed & Commerce? Building a border fence & deporting illegals? Getting rid of excessive taxes whether Congress wants it or not?
Or are they just going to grow the behemoth through additional tinkering?
Nanny State Indeed!
“All 3 Branches have been doing Whatever they felt like doing for far too long,..”
Most of them spit on the Constitution, regardless of Party Affiliation, or act like dictators.
If conservatives are afraid to vote their conscience, when we have a president worse than Jimmy Carter, when will they gain some courage?
We desperately need a strong Constitutional Conservative in the White House!
If we don’t get that candidate in the primaries, there are some who are itching for a 3rd party, and then Obama could win.
Its never been in question to those familiar with the data.
Not just Gardasil, but all of the vaccines have that potential. They’re literal death coctails.
>> “but honestly that site is against EVERY vaccine. I’m not.” <<
.
If you study more, you will be.
You read AHRP as AARP and expect it to be considered as credible?
>>If you study more, you will be.<<
Not really. I’ve done a fair amount of studying.
I’m not against DPT or MMR. Although after speaking to friends who have Autistic children, I wouldn’t go for the group shots if I had to do it all over again and certainly time them farther apart.
The rest they can keep.
>> “and VAERS has shown no causation between the vaccine and mental retardation” <<
.
The causation is the anaerobic nature of vaccines, which can multiply rapidly, depending on how the vaccine is imbedded into the tissue. Hit a blood vessel and it could be fatal.
“there are some who are itching for a 3rd party, and then Obama could win”
Anything’s possible, but what’s eating me is that Obama’s making himself So unpopular that the same R party apparatchiks who tossed the last election by offering us Canvasback McCain will shove someone at us who’s just more business as usual rather than upset the pork wagon.
The bar for defeating Obama is so low already, I fear my own party bosses more than the Dems at this point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.