I'll take one...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: smokingfrog
Hey guys, Christmas is coming and I’ve been a good boy...
2 posted on
09/21/2011 10:10:44 AM PDT by
Free Vulcan
(Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
To: smokingfrog
‘I will gladly pay the tax stamp on Wednesday for a Glock machine pistol today’ ... just sayin’
3 posted on
09/21/2011 10:12:20 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: smokingfrog
whoever the dealer is better be ready for an atf raid.
4 posted on
09/21/2011 10:13:00 AM PDT by
absolootezer0
(2x divorced tattooed pierced harley hatin meghan mccain luvin' REAL beer drinkin' smoker ..what?)
To: smokingfrog
Maybe if you ship them to Mexico .... oh, wait ...
5 posted on
09/21/2011 10:13:07 AM PDT by
Hodar
( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
To: smokingfrog
Actually, making a Glock full auto is not that difficult. Illegal without a stamp, but not that difficult. But why would ya if it isn’t registered and functioning as a short barreled rifle?
6 posted on
09/21/2011 10:13:52 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: smokingfrog
McQueary is refusing to pay for the guns because it's not clear why they were shipped to the department in the first place.Awh man. Operation GunWalker strikes again.
7 posted on
09/21/2011 10:14:13 AM PDT by
agere_contra
("Debt is the foundation of destruction" : Sarah Palin.)
To: smokingfrog
“Police Chief Rick McQueary says they’re too dangerous to use for officers who must carefully consider every shot.”
Didn’t some generals say the same thing about repeating rifles when they first came out?
On the other hand, considering how careful a lot of cops are about how and what they shoot, maybe its a good idea to dispose of them.
8 posted on
09/21/2011 10:19:41 AM PDT by
ZULU
(DUMP Obama in 2012)
To: smokingfrog
I have fired one of these things and I can’t see how they would be very useful for anything other than maybe a bodyguard who doesn’t care about anybody but the person he is protecting. It is definitely not something law enforcement would need for any purpose.
9 posted on
09/21/2011 10:21:25 AM PDT by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: smokingfrog
How can such a pistol be controllable? Without a shoulder stock I can see bullets going every which way but into the target.
To: smokingfrog
Someone gots some ‘splaining to do. It's not like a pizza delivery to the wrong address. Departmental procurement officer caught in the act of an attempted diversion?
12 posted on
09/21/2011 10:24:25 AM PDT by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: smokingfrog
IIRC, there are a few “transferrable” Glock 18s around ... running about $250,000 each.
13 posted on
09/21/2011 10:24:53 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
To: smokingfrog
I can’t see much use for one either but I still wouldn’t mind if they gave them to me.
14 posted on
09/21/2011 10:24:58 AM PDT by
yarddog
To: smokingfrog
Better aim low, really low for the first round, after that muzzle climb will give you, maybe to hits. The rest, who knows. I suspect the pistol has a full auto cutoff.
The military had to limit the AR-15 to three round bursts because of troops just pulling the trigger and hoping. Does not work so well in a fire fight.
Gunner
15 posted on
09/21/2011 10:25:01 AM PDT by
weps4ret
(Democrats + Liberal Stream Media = Blood Liable)
To: smokingfrog
Better aim low, really low for the first round, after that muzzle climb will give you, maybe to hits. The rest, who knows. I suspect the pistol has a full auto cutoff.
The military had to limit the AR-15 to three round bursts because of troops just pulling the trigger and hoping. Does not work so well in a fire fight.
Gunner
16 posted on
09/21/2011 10:25:07 AM PDT by
weps4ret
(Democrats + Liberal Stream Media = Blood Liable)
To: smokingfrog
Send me two. I want to dual wield those bad boys!! I’ve seen the G18 in action and they are sweet!
17 posted on
09/21/2011 10:25:55 AM PDT by
Bryanw92
(The solution to fix Congress: Nuke em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure!)
To: smokingfrog
25 posted on
09/21/2011 10:37:26 AM PDT by
USMCPOP
(Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
To: smokingfrog
"...officials at the Greenwood Police Department don't know who ordered the Glock machine pistols."Some police department.
27 posted on
09/21/2011 10:43:56 AM PDT by
Paine in the Neck
(Where's he getting these ideas? He's not smart enough to be that stupid all by himself.)
To: smokingfrog
Proficiency with automatic weapons requires many more hours of range work—work that most people won’t do. Otherwise, automatic weapons (especially short-barreled ones) are practically useless. Even with the required training, they’re only good for very close range work. Work is the key word, and lots of it. Shotguns can be better for that in most cases. Automatic weapons in urban or suburban environments nowadays would be more dangerous to bystanders than bad guys.
29 posted on
09/21/2011 10:52:24 AM PDT by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), Army NG, '89-' 96)
To: smokingfrog
BTW, the only uses that I’ve seen for automatic weapons are those of clearing buildings (killing everything in each room) and jungle warfare.
31 posted on
09/21/2011 10:54:50 AM PDT by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), Army NG, '89-' 96)
To: smokingfrog
Can any nitwit in the police department order an automatic weapon or does the individual have to have FFL and do officers need an FFL?
33 posted on
09/21/2011 11:10:54 AM PDT by
School of Rational Thought
("The proposition that the government is always right is manifested either in corruption or benefits)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson